Skip to content
Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$425kHealth$215kEducation$126kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$13kPublic Benefit$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$122,786
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$122,786
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST: $500 → 12%QUILTS OF VALOR: $500 → 7%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $500 → 10%TINY PURPOSE: $500 → 12%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $1k → 10%SENIOR CENTERS INC: $500 → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $30 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 5%.

Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$249k · 3 repeat orgs$583k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
81

Total granted

$249k
$583k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+29%

Still filing today

33%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2025 · $123k · revenue +28%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $111k
  • HA
    HAITIAN AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $15k

Funded once

  • GH
    GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $425k · revenue +31%
  • YH
    YORK HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +11%
  • SCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Long Term Care Ombudsman

As mandated by the federal older americans act and ohio law, the mission of the long term care ombudsman program is to seek the resolution of problems and advocate for the rights of the home care consumers and residents of long- term care…

—
3
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

—
4
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
5
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
6
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
7
Hospice of Dayton Inc

The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…

Human Services
8
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
9
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
10
Owensboro Health Foundation Inc

To raise, steward, and distribute philanthropic funds in support of owensboro health's mission to heal the sick and improve health in western kentucky and southern indiana.

Health
11
University of Toledo Alumni Association

Supporting the university of toledo by fostering a spirit of loyalty among its alumni.

Education
12
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathlights Human Services; the most unlike its peers is Save Monroe Strays. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC: $425,000 · HealthGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INCYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION+5 more: $5,779 · HealthALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $110,736 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONHAITIAN AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherHAITIAN AMERICAN NURSES…SCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherSCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC+52 more: $37,481 · Other+52 moreOTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $122,911 · EducationOTTAWA HILLS SCHO…+5 more: $3,194 · EducationGuitars For Vets Inc: $10,000 · Public BenefitPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $9,721 · Public Benefit+1 more: $500 · Public BenefitUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $3,449 · PhilanthropyToledo Choral Society: $1,500 · PhilanthropyVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $1,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A Cause: $500 · Human ServicesSENIOR CENTERS INC: $500 · Human ServicesQUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesTINY PURPOSE: $500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $30 · Human ServicesTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsSAVE MONROE STRAYS: $500 · AnimalsTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $500 · AnimalsBLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY: $500 · Animals
Health$500,779Other$173,217Education$126,105Public Benefit$20,221Philanthropy$4,949Human Services$3,530Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC: $425,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $122,911 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGuitars For Vets Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $9,721 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND HOSPICE MEMORIAL FUND INC: $4,914 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,779 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $3,449 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE FREE LIBRARY: $664 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREAD FOR LITERACY INC: $530 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD BEDFORD VILLAGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBowling Green Curling Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEAR BLUE RUN TO REMEMBER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSENIOR CENTERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Legion: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CLOUD HOSPITAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Compassionate Friends Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTINY PURPOSE: $500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERIE SHORES COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNIGHTINGALES HARVEST: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetETA NU EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget4-H CLUBS OF YORK COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DEFIANCE COUNTY INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPenny Road Elementary School PTA: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foun…The O-I Charities Fou…Dana Charitable Found…United Way of Greater…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Enterprise Holdings F…The Blackbaud Giving …AbbVie FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
Toledo Community Foundation IncOH20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hcr Manor Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home