· Private foundation
Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $122,786 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 5% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OHOTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2025 · $123k · revenue +28%
- AAALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION2× · 2020–2021 · $111k
- HAHAITIAN AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION2× · 2020–2022 · $15k
Funded once
- GHGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $425k · revenue +31%
- YHYORK HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +11%
SCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
As mandated by the federal older americans act and ohio law, the mission of the long term care ombudsman program is to seek the resolution of problems and advocate for the rights of the home care consumers and residents of long- term care…
The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.
To raise, steward, and distribute philanthropic funds in support of owensboro health's mission to heal the sick and improve health in western kentucky and southern indiana.
Supporting the university of toledo by fostering a spirit of loyalty among its alumni.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathlights Human Services and the most unlike its peers is Save Monroe Strays. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds OTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YORK HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Guitars For Vets Inc ↗
- Who funds PROMEDICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATHLIGHTS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND HOSPICE MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds Toledo Choral Society ↗
- Who funds Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LITTLE FREE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds READ FOR LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds QUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
- Who funds OLD BEDFORD VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Bowling Green Curling Inc ↗
- Who funds WEAR BLUE RUN TO REMEMBER ↗
- Who funds STANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds SAVE MONROE STRAYS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hcr Manor Care Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.