Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hayes Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$458k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$948kHealth$947kInternational$512kHuman Services$426kPublic Safety & Disaster$281kHousing & Shelter$272kCommunity Improvement$177kYouth Development$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $390k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS$40,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION$35,000
THE GUILD$30,000
FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY$23,000
RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL FOUNDATION$20,000
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$20,000
OREGON FOOD BANK- TILLAMOOK COUNTY SERVICES$20,000
MARION POLK FOOD SHARE PROGRAM$20,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$20,000
YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$20,000
VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$20,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER ASSOCIATION$18,000
NEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$15,000
SALEM FREE CLINICS$15,000
BELLINGHAM FOOD BANK$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $796k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $1k → 11%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $20k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $15k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $15k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $10k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $10k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $10k → 10%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $40k → 14%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $10k → 10%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $40k → 14%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $10k → 10%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $40k → 14%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $10k → 10%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $40k → 14%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $30k → 14%LATINO VOICES OF MINNESOTA: $4k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $40k → 12%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $30k → 14%LATINO VOICES OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $40k → 12%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $20k → 14%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $40k → 12%FAMILY BUILDINGS BLOCKS: $20k → 14%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $35k → 12%FAMILY BUILDINGS BLOCKS: $20k → 14%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $35k → 12%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $32k → 12%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 11%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 11%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $12k → 11%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 49 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
17

Total granted

$3.6M
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+139%

Still filing today

63%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $292k · revenue +49%
  • FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +149%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    7× · 2019–2025 · $242k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $84k · revenue +59%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE ENTERPRISES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • JB
    J BAR J YOUTH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
5
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
6
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
7
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
8
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless

Since 1986, open your heart to the hungry and homeless has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness. by partnering with organizations serving those in need, we grow donor engagement and raise awareness to…

—
9
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
11
The Open Door

The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
12
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for Lane County; the most unlike its peers is Wheel to Walk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
37/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $292,000 · OtherFOOD FOR LANE COUNTYNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $161,000 · OtherNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYOREGON FOOD BANK- TILLAMOOK COUNTY SERVICES: $155,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK- TILLAMOOK COUNTY SERVICESVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $155,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINERIDGEVIEW MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $148,000 · OtherRIDGEVIEW MEDICAL FOUNDATIONGuild: $142,000 · OtherGuildMARION POLK FOOD SHARE PROGRAM: $100,000 · OtherSALEM FREE CLINICS: $87,000 · OtherNESTUCCA VALLEY BACK PACK FOOD PROGRAM: $70,000 · OtherSOUTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $70,000 · Other+35 more: $548,190 · Other+35 moreFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $280,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS I…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $242,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cr…YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $157,000 · Human ServicesYAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION…NEIGHBORIMPACT: $110,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACT+2 more: $7,000 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $144,000 · HealthVIRGINIA GA…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $84,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…PROVIDENCE NEWBERG HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE …VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $40,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS …WITH COURAGE: $18,000 · Health+2 more: $16,000 · HealthAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $69,000 · Food & NutritionSEED TO TABLE OREGON: $66,000 · Food & NutritionPositive Community Kitchen: $48,000 · Food & NutritionMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 · Food & NutritionMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $195,000 · InternationalChildren's Cancer Association: $183,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB: $23,000 · EnvironmentTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentLAKE SUPERIOR CENTER: $1,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $1,000 · Environment
Other$1,928,190Human Services$796,000Health$377,000Food & Nutrition$208,000International$195,000Arts & Culture$183,000Environment$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $292,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $280,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $242,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $195,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Cancer Association: $183,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $161,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetYAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $157,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $144,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGuild: $142,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $110,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM FREE CLINICS: $87,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $84,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE NEWBERG HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $69,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSEED TO TABLE OREGON: $66,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $55,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED: $53,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPositive Community Kitchen: $48,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBridging Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Harvest Northland: $29,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB: $23,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWITH COURAGE: $18,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOND BETWEEN: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Medical Foundation Tillamook: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBreakthrough Twin Cities: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO VOICES OF MINNESOTA: $6,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE INC OF EASTERN CARVER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
  • Who funds NEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Guild ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
  • Who funds SALEM FREE CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE NEWBERG HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SEED TO TABLE OREGON ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Positive Community Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Bridging Inc ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Northland ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WITH COURAGE ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford Family FoundationOR30× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Austin Family Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hayes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hayes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • J Bar J Youth Services Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Yamhill Community Action Partnership: 61% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization: 4% of income from government
  • Northwest Medical Foundation Tillamook: 1% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine Clinic: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hayes Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hayes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hayes Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph