Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hayden Freedom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$497k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$3.4MFood & Nutrition$1.2MHuman Services$1.1MReligion$965kYouth Development$183kPhilanthropy$130kHealth$115kEducation$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $385k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $280k
  • $250k+1 grant · $497k
$22,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RETRIEVING FREEDOM$497,000
OPEN DOOR$100,000
BROADWAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$95,000
SHOW ME CHRISTIAN HOME$85,000
WHISKEY RIDGE RESCUE$45,000
MO STATE FAIR FOUNDATION$45,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS$30,000
SACRED HEART FOUNDATION$25,000
CHILD SAFE OF CENTRAL MO$22,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$22,500
MCKENNA CLAIRE FOUNDATION$22,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$22,500
CASA$22,500
AKC CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $40k → 11%AMERICAS MIGHTY WARRIORS: $40k → 11%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $30k → 11%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $16k → 11%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $14k → 11%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
MO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 29 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$7.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+63%

Still filing today

41%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +11% · 32% of their budget
  • MS
    MISSOURI STATE FAIR FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $751k · revenue +305% · 27% of their budget
  • WR
    WHISKEY RIDGE RESCUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $440k · revenue +6% · 92% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $682k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • SM
    SHOW ME CHRITIAN HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Standardbred Retirement Foundation Inc

Our heartfelt mission is to rescue horses from the threat of slaughter, secure loving homes with the distinctive commitment to lifelong follow up and guardianship. we tirelessly promote a universal understanding that horses require a…

Civil Rights
2
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
3
Missouri German Shepherd Rescue

We are a dog rescue organization dedicated to saving homeless, abused and neglected german shepherds and mixes, and to preventing homelessness and cruelty to animals.

Animals
4
Southeast Missouri Hospital Foundation

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
5
Mercy Hospital Springfield

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
6
The American German Shepherd Dog Charitable Foundation

To help fund research studies aimed at reducing the incedence of medical conditions in the german shepherd dog and improveing the effectiveness of treatment of many types of medical conditions. we research and fund medical studies to look…

—
7
The Senior Dog Sanctuary

To provide a safe haven for senior dogs that are abandoned, abused, or face euthanasia who are unable to be cared for by their owners.

Animals
8
Mercy Health Foundation South

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
9
St Mary's Hospital Centralia Illinois

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
10
Southeast Hospital

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
11
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
12
Christus Health Foundation

To promote philanthropy and charitable giving and to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health and related entities in the mission of extending the healing ministry of jesus christ.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri 4-H Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Coens Way. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROADWAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $685,259 · OtherBROADWAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $681,877 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHOW ME CHRISTIAN HOME: $380,000 · OtherSHOW ME CHRISTIAN HOMEOPEN DOOR FOOD PANTRY: $305,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR FOOD PANTRYOPEN DOOR SERVICE CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR SERVICE CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $145,000 · OtherCASA INC: $143,000 · OtherMCKENNA CLAIRE FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherCHILD SAFE OF CENTRAL MO: $122,500 · Other+25 more: $866,300 · Other+25 moreRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC: $2,762,741 · AnimalsRETRIEVING FREEDOM INCWHISKEY RIDGE RESCUE: $440,000 · AnimalsWHISKEY RIDGE RESCUEAMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $155,000 · AnimalsMISSOURI STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $750,583 · Community ImprovementMISSOURI S…AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $150,226 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $67,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $40,000 · HealthSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS OF SEDALIA: $47,000 · Food & NutritionNRA SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION FUND: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,653,936Animals$3,357,741Community Improvement$750,583Human Services$150,226Health$107,500Education$85,000Food & Nutrition$47,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC: $2,762,741 over 5y, 32% of budgetMISSOURI STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $750,583 over 6y, 27% of budgetWHISKEY RIDGE RESCUE: $440,000 over 6y, 92% of budgetOPEN DOOR SERVICE CENTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetAMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $150,226 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetSACRED HEART FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $67,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SEDALIA: $47,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOENS WAY: $30,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetMISSOURI 4-H FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNRA SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI STATE FAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHISKEY RIDGE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SEDALIA ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds COENS WAY ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI 4-H FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hayden Freedom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hayden Freedom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hayden Freedom’s filings →

More from the funding graph