Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hawks Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$601k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Education$272kPhilanthropy$187kArts & Culture$124kScience & Tech$120kReligion$33kPublic Benefit$30kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LORAS COLLEGE$250,000
THE MIAMI FOUNDATION$117,000
BOOOSTR TECHNOLOGY INC$80,000
G KOLLABERATIVE INC$63,000
AMERICA'S FUTURE INC$30,000
EQUALSRQ INC$13,000
FRIENDS OF NEWPORT SKATE PARK$10,000
BORDER 911 FOUNDATION INC$10,000
SECOND HEART HOMES$6,350
EVANGELICAL FRIENDS CHURCH$5,000
AWAKENING WHOLENESS INC$5,000
FIDELITY WELLNESS CORP$3,600
CHILDRENS GUARDIAN FUND INC$1,000
VIE FOR THE KIDS$1,000
JAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN FIRST: $250 → 22%SNACC INC: $500 → 17%MANASOTA SOLVE INC DBA SOLVE MATERNITY HOMES: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
DE
AZ
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$318k · 9 repeat orgs$393k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
21

Total granted

$318k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureSocial ScienceRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PENNFIELD SCHOOL
    2× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +17%
  • EQUALSRQ INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +195%
  • SECOND HEART HOMES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • D
    DONORLY
    one grant, 2023 · $65k
  • GB
    GILCREST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • OM
    ONE MISSION DISASTER RESPONSE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hfsf Grants Management Inc

The mission of health foundation of south florida is to invest in and be a catalyst for collaborations, policy and systems change that improves the health of south florida communities, with a focus on vulnerable, low to moderate-income…

2
South Florida Behavioral Health Network

South florida behavioral health network inc, ensures a quality system of care for people at risk and affected by substance use and mental health disorders in miami dade and monroe counties

Health
3
Secure Florida's Future Inc

Secure florida's future's primary exempt purpose is to educate the citizens of florida about economic competitiveness and job growth opportunities to secure florida's future.

4
Florida Is for Veterans Inc

Veterans florida provides career, skillbridge and entrepreneurship training and opportunities for separating or retiring servicemembers, veterans, and their spouses in or moving to florida, and we assist employers seeking to strengthen…

Public Benefit
5
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
6
Health Foundation of South Florida Inc

The mission of health foundation of south florida is to invest in and be a catalyst for collaborations, policy and systems change that improves the health of south florida communities, with a focus on vulnerable, low to moderate-income…

7
Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness

Lead agency in the community for providers of homeless/prevention services in manatee/sarasota. responsible to plan strategies with community partners, assist with grants, educate the public, advocate with local leadership, administer the…

Human Services
8
Suncoast Waterkeeper Inc

We unite the suncoast to protect and improve our waters through science-driven actions.

9
Sarasota Police Foundation Inc

To improve public safety in the city of sarasota, florida, by providing resources and support to the sarasota city police department that are not readily available through other means.

Crime & Legal
10
Florida Philanthropic Network Inc

As a statewide association of grantmakers, fpn builds philanthropy for a better florida. we do this through research and education, collaboration, and advancing public policy for the common good of all floridians.

Philanthropy
11
Women's Resource Center of Manatee Inc

The center is dedicated to improving and maintaining the quality of life for all women of manatee county by providing an environment that fosters the open exchange of ideas and ideals; providing the support for the attainment of…

Human Services
12
Fss Foundation Inc

For the benefit of and to support family support services of north florida, inc in providing for the safety and stability of children and families by strengthening the child protection system, and involving neighborhood networks to ensure…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Guardian Fund and the most unlike its peers is Hand Up to Victory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%13%<5yr14%31%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%60%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
12/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LORAS COLLEGE — $250,000 · OtherLORAS COLLEGEG KOLLABERATIVE INC — $123,000 · OtherG KOLLABERATIVE INCBOOOSTR TECHNOLOGY INC — $120,000 · OtherBOOOSTR TECHNOLOGY INCDONORLY — $64,500 · OtherDONORLYAMERICAS FUTURE INC — $30,000 · Other+34 more — $75,850 · Other+34 moreTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $117,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDA…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyEQUALSRQ INC — $19,000 · HealthBORDER911 FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Social ScienceFRIENDS OF NEWPORT SKATEPARK — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSECOND HEART HOMES INC — $6,600 · Housing & ShelterGrants Central Station — $1,000 · EducationBookleggers Library Inc — $500 · EducationCHILDREN OF FALLEN SOLDIERS RELIEF FUND INC — $250 · Education
Other$663,350Philanthropy$123,000Health$19,000Social Science$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Housing & Shelter$6,600Education$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLORAS COLLEGE — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $117,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAS FUTURE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PENNFIELD SCHOOL — $21,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEQUALSRQ INC — $19,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetBORDER911 FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEWPORT SKATEPARK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSECOND HEART HOMES INC — $6,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S GUARDIAN FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGrants Central Station — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT 100 SRQ INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF LONGBOAT KEY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNACC INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSouth Dade Womens Veterans Alliance Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBookleggers Library Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAfrican Dream Academy Foundation Incorporated — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWE ARE ALL MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSIC HAVEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAND UP TO VICTORY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BAY WILDLIFE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN OF FALLEN SOLDIERS RELIEF FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANASOTA-SOLVE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSRQ VETS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChildren First PA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gulf Coast Community Foundation IncFL18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · Mile High United Way Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hawks Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 120%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Music Haven Inc15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph