How much did HAWKS FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of HAWKS FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

church

2022

—

2023

childrensolve

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k17 grants · $28k
$10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$250k+1 grant · $250k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$362k

Total assets

Largest grants

LORAS COLLEGE$250,000
THE MIAMI FOUNDATION$117,000
BOOOSTR TECHNOLOGY INC$80,000
G KOLLABERATIVE INC$63,000
AMERICA'S FUTURE INC$30,000
EQUALSRQ INC$13,000
BORDER 911 FOUNDATION INC$10,000
FRIENDS OF NEWPORT SKATE PARK$10,000
SECOND HEART HOMES$6,350
EVANGELICAL FRIENDS CHURCH$5,000
AWAKENING WHOLENESS INC$5,000
FIDELITY WELLNESS CORP$3,600
JAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
IMPACT 100 SQR$1,000
VIE FOR THE KIDS$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$318k · 9 repeat orgs$515k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +195% since the first grant, against +78% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$318k

$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%

+78%

Still filing today

33%

41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $433k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyArts & CultureCrime & LegalInternationalCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TP
THE PENNFIELD SCHOOL
2× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +5%
EQUALSRQ INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +195%
SECOND HEART HOMES
2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +837%

Funded once

D
DONORLY
one grant, 2023 · $65k
CF
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +28%
GB
GILCREST BAPTIST CHURCH
one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

South Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc

Sfbhn ensures a quality system of care for people at risk and affected by substance use and mental health disorders in miami dade and monroe counties.

Health

Hfsf Grants Management Inc

Our vision is for all south floridians to have an equal opportunity to achieve optimal health and well-being.

—

Nami Florida Inc

Helping to improve the quality of life for individuals and their families affected by mental illness through education, training, information, referral, advocacy and government relations.

—

Health Foundation of South Florida Inc

Our vision is for all south floridians to have an equal opportunity to achieve optimal health and well-being.

—

Mental Health Community Centers Inc

Mental health community centers provides a safe environment, promoting wellness, for individuals managing mental health.

—

Coalition for a Drug-Free Hawaii

To reduce and prevent drug abuse in hawaii through awareness, education, and action.

—

Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc

Community foundation which grants funds to other charitable organizations.

Philanthropy

Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness

As lead agency for the sarasota/manatee continuum of care, suncoast partnership collaborates with providers of services and housing for those who are homeless and those at imminent risk of homelessness. we receive and distribute grants,…

Human Services

Community Foundation of North

To enhance the quality of life in north florida through the support of charitable giving.

Philanthropy

Nami Sarasota and Manatee Counties Inc

Provide support, education, awareness, and advocacy to individuals living with mental health conditions and/or co-occurring substance use challenges, their families, and caregivers.

Human Services

Florida Community Loan Fund Inc

To provide loans and technical assistance to nonprofit ormission-focused for-profit organizations to develop affordable housing,supportive housing (which includes social services for residents),community facilities, and economic…

Community Improvement

Coconino Community College Foundation

Provide educational assistance and support for coconino community college

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Colorado Nonprofit Development and the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation Boulder County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

18/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$683,100Philanthropy$122,000Health$19,000Housing & Shelter$6,600Crime & Legal$1,000Education$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Msc Foundation IncFL13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Msc Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HAWKS FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

10get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EQUALSRQ INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 922386731 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EQUALSRQ INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hawks Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hawks Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HAWKS FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hawks Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

HAWKS FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hawks Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph