Skip to content

· Private foundation

Haupt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$172k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$490kReligion$72kArts & Culture$57kPhilanthropy$41kInternational$36kCivil Rights$35kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,300
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAHN FELLOWS PROGRAM$50,000
UJA-FEDERATION$36,000
ARTHUR MILLER FOUNDATION$29,150
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$12,903
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ADL$7,500
SHOE 4 AFRICA$3,300
MT SINAI KRAVIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
THANC$2,500
HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON$1,620
FRIENDS OF THE UNITED HATZOLAH$1,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$1,000
STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTREACH: $4k → 12%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $750 → 10%HEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTREACH: $4k → 12%HEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTREACH: $3k → 12%HEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTREACH: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$537k · 14 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$537k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CAHN FELLOWS PROGRAMS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $303k · revenue +186%
  • AM
    ARTHUR MILLER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $52k · revenue +40%
  • SI
    SHOE4AFRICA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +48%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k
  • TH
    The Hastings Center Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
7
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
8
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is 303 Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CAHN FELLOWS PROGRAMS: $303,000 · EducationTHE CAHN FELLOWS PROGRAMSTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $184,400 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+1 more: $3,120 · EducationPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC: $70,704 · OtherPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientADL: $10,554 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherThe Hastings Center Inc: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherHEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTREACH INC: $11,700 · OtherHEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTRE…WRITE ON SPORTS INC: $8,500 · Other+17 more: $38,560 · Other+17 moreARTHUR MILLER FOUNDATION: $51,520 · PhilanthropyARTHUR MILL…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWI…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $34,500 · Civil RightsSHOE4AFRICA INC: $17,300 · Recreation & SportsMR C S BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports303 DEVELOPMENT CORP: $1,250 · Recreation & SportsISRAEL-AMERICA ACADEMIC EXCHANGE: $10,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $9,108 · InternationalFeeding America: $13,500 · Food & Nutrition
Education$490,520Other$208,518Philanthropy$88,520Civil Rights$34,500Recreation & Sports$23,550International$19,108Food & Nutrition$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CAHN FELLOWS PROGRAMS: $303,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $184,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARTHUR MILLER FOUNDATION: $51,520 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $34,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOE4AFRICA INC: $17,300 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFeeding America: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS OF THE FATHER OUTREACH INC: $11,700 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetThe Hastings Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL-AMERICA ACADEMIC EXCHANGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHIAS INC: $9,108 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWRITE ON SPORTS INC: $8,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMR C S BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetHUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC: $3,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS MUSIC COMMISSION: $1,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget303 DEVELOPMENT CORP: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMunicipal Art Society of New York: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE FARMS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternet Archive: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Adelson Family Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haupt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haupt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haupt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph