Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hauck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$195kHuman Services$173kReligion$118kHousing & Shelter$37kHealth$17kCrime & Legal$15kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$200
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$2,400
Median grant
8
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,269
GOD BEHIND BARS$15,000
RIO REVOLUTION CHURCH$13,200
TRUE PURPOSE MINISTRIES$11,998
SAFE FAMILIES$10,000
KNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES$3,744
BLOOMERANG PREGNANCY LLC$2,400
HOPE LIFE CENTER$2,400
EAGLE MTN INTL CHURCH$1,200
WORLD CHANGERS CHURCH INTERNATIONAL$1,001
K LOVE$600
THE RAMP CHURCH$100
Individual grant recipient$80
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE 4 ONE MINISTRIES: $20k → 13%SAFE FAMILIES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IA
IN
PA
NE
MO
AR
TN
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$498k · 16 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$498k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+35%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $195k · revenue +27%
  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $132k · revenue +28%
  • TP
    True Purpose Ministries
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • H4
    Hope 4 One Ministries
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -55%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
2
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
3
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health
4
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
5
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
6
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
7
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
8
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
9
New Hope Center Inc

To save lives and strengthen families through sexual risk-avoidance programs, unplanned pregnancy support and after abortion care. free services include pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, parenting classes, material support, adoption education,…

Human Services
10
Lifecare Pregnancy Resources Inc

Sharing the gospel message and upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of Christ to men and women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing spiritual, physical, and emotional support.

Human Services
11
Hope Resource Center

Hope resource center, a life-affirming medical clinic, demonstrates the love of christ by providing educational resources and medical services to women and men facing an unplanned pregnancy or sexual health concern in knoxville and…

Health
12
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope 4 One Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $195,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $132,347 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES …GOD BEHIND BARS INC: $15,000 · ReligionGOD BEHIND BARS INCIndividual grant recipient: $49,335 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRIO REVOLUTION: $41,520 · OtherRIO REVOLUTIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,951 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWORLD CHANGERS CHURCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,501 · OtherBLOOMERANG PREGNANCY LLC: $4,800 · Other+12 more: $19,760 · Other+12 moreTrue Purpose Ministries: $22,850 · Housing & ShelterKNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC: $12,168 · Housing & ShelterHope 4 One Ministries: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPE LIFE CENTER: $8,400 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $200 · Recreation & Sports
International$195,000Religion$147,347Other$140,867Housing & Shelter$35,018Human Services$30,000Health$8,400Recreation & Sports$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $195,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $132,347 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTrue Purpose Ministries: $22,850 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHope 4 One Ministries: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetKNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC: $12,168 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE LIFE CENTER: $8,400 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $3,660 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds True Purpose Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Hope 4 One Ministries ↗
  • Who funds GOD BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds KNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hauck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hauck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hauck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph