Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hauck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

International$195kHuman Services$173kReligion$118kHousing & Shelter$37kHealth$17kCrime & Legal$15kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$200
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$2,400
Median grant
8
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,269
GOD BEHIND BARS$15,000
RIO REVOLUTION CHURCH$13,200
TRUE PURPOSE MINISTRIES$11,998
SAFE FAMILIES$10,000
KNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES$3,744
BLOOMERANG PREGNANCY LLC$2,400
HOPE LIFE CENTER$2,400
EAGLE MTN INTL CHURCH$1,200
WORLD CHANGERS CHURCH INTERNATIONAL$1,001
K LOVE$600
THE RAMP CHURCH$100
Individual grant recipient$80
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE 4 ONE MINISTRIES: $20k → 13%SAFE FAMILIES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
IA
IN
PA
NE
MO
AR
TN
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$498k · 16 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$498k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+35%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $195k · revenue +27%
  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $132k · revenue +28%
  • TP
    True Purpose Ministries
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • H4
    Hope 4 One Ministries
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -55%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
2
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
3
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health
4
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
5
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
6
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
7
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
8
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
9
New Hope Center Inc

To save lives and strengthen families through sexual risk-avoidance programs, unplanned pregnancy support and after abortion care. free services include pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, parenting classes, material support, adoption education,…

Human Services
10
Lifecare Pregnancy Resources Inc

Sharing the gospel message and upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of Christ to men and women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing spiritual, physical, and emotional support.

Human Services
11
Hope Resource Center

Hope resource center, a life-affirming medical clinic, demonstrates the love of christ by providing educational resources and medical services to women and men facing an unplanned pregnancy or sexual health concern in knoxville and…

Health
12
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope 4 One Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $195,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $132,347 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES …GOD BEHIND BARS INC — $15,000 · ReligionGOD BEHIND BARS INCIndividual grant recipient — $49,335 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRIO REVOLUTION — $41,520 · OtherRIO REVOLUTIONIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $9,951 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWORLD CHANGERS CHURCH INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,501 · OtherBLOOMERANG PREGNANCY LLC — $4,800 · Other+12 more — $19,760 · Other+12 moreTrue Purpose Ministries — $22,850 · Housing & ShelterKNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC — $12,168 · Housing & ShelterHope 4 One Ministries — $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPE LIFE CENTER — $8,400 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $200 · Recreation & Sports
International$195,000Religion$147,347Other$140,867Housing & Shelter$35,018Human Services$30,000Health$8,400Recreation & Sports$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $195,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $132,347 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTrue Purpose Ministries — $22,850 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHope 4 One Ministries — $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetKNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC — $12,168 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE LIFE CENTER — $8,400 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER — $3,660 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds True Purpose Ministries
  • Who funds Hope 4 One Ministries
  • Who funds GOD BEHIND BARS INC
  • Who funds KNOX AREA RESCUE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE
  • Who funds HOPE LIFE CENTER
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hauck Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph