Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hattie & Marie V Fatz Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$322kHealth$131kEnvironment$20kRecreation & Sports$16kEducation$11kHuman Services$8kCivil Rights$7kAnimals$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$838k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Donna Reed Foundation for the Performing Arts$30,000
Grant Park Orchestral Association$20,000
Institute for Shipboard Education$10,000
Field Museum of Chicago$10,000
Chicago Botanic Garden$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Families Helping Families Chicagoland: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IA
NJ
CO
MD
TN
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427k · 14 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$427k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+53%

Still filing today

50%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +127%
  • TD
    THE DONNA REED FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    2× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +37% · 43% of their budget
  • PL
    PRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • AA
    Ann A Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • LC
    Lurie's Children's Hospital
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • DR
    Donna Reed Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
2
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
5
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
6
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc

The organization's mission is to create extraordinary learning experiences across the arts, sciences and humanities that have the power to transform the lives of children and families. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Shakespeare Theater

To create vivid, entertaining theatrical experiences that invigorate and engage people of all ages and identities by illuminating the complexity, ambiguity, and wonder of our world. shared humanity and unforgettable stories - now this is…

Arts & Culture
8
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
9
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
10
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
11
International Society for Stem Cell Rese

The international society for stem cell research is an independent, nonprofit organization. the mission is to promote excellence in stem cell research and applications to human health.

Health
12
The Chicago Academy of Sciences

The mission of cas/pnnm is to create a positive relationship between people and nature through collaborations, education, research and collections, exhibits and public forums that foster urban connections to our region's nature and science.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grant Park Orchestral Association; the most unlike its peers is National Tuberous Sclerosis Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Field Museum of Chicago: $75,000 · OtherField Museum of ChicagoLurie Childrens Hospital: $50,000 · OtherLurie Childrens HospitalAnn A Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital: $25,000 · OtherAnn A Robert H Lurie Children's HospitalLurie's Children's Hospital: $20,000 · OtherLurie's Children's HospitalAmerican Cancer Society: $20,000 · OtherAmerican Cancer SocietyChicago Architectural Foundation: $15,500 · OtherChicago Architectural FoundationDonna Reed Foundation: $15,000 · OtherDonna Reed Foundation+8 more: $23,500 · Other+8 moreGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $160,000 · Arts & CultureGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATIONTHE DONNA REED FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DONNA REED FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING …CHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $20,000 · EnvironmentPRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $500 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $5,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DOWN SYNDROME: $2,500 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $10,000 · EducationTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$244,000Arts & Culture$209,000Environment$20,000Recreation & Sports$15,500Health$13,000Education$10,000Crime & Legal$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $160,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DONNA REED FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENDER LOVING CARE ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DONNA REED FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TENDER LOVING CARE ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DOWN SYNDROME ↗
  • Who funds Starlights Skating Club ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES CHICAGOLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hattie & Marie V Fatz Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hattie & Marie V Fatz Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hattie & Marie V Fatz Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Hattie & Marie V Fatz Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hattie & Marie V Fatz Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph