Skip to content
Hasson Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hasson Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$437k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$383k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Philanthropy$417kYouth Development$34kReligion$6kEducation$5kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$474Public Benefit$300International$176Other$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
  • $250k+1 grant · $383k
$2,770
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fidelity Charitable Fund - Hasson Family Fund$383,379
Fidelity Charitable Fund - Hasson Family Fund$30,345
Camp Morasha$18,000
Individual grant recipient$2,770
Hebrew Theological College$1,000
Hechal Mordechai$1,000
Ida Crown Academy$360
Amudei Chesed$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $224) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warriors Project: $100 → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $72 → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $52 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
PA
CT
CA
MO
MD
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 19 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
27

Total granted

$106k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+39%

Still filing today

42%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $414k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CAMP MORASHA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $34k · revenue +9%
  • HM
    Heichal Mordechai Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +129%
  • AC
    AMUDEI CHESED INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TI
    TorahAnytimeCom Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $800
  • AF
    American Friends of the Jewish Museum Greece
    one grant, 2021 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
5
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Or Yechiel

Award grants to promote torah study

Religion
8
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
9
Friends of Nir Kiryat Arba

To promote the study of torah

Religion
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Sacred Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is TorahAnytimeCom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fidelity Charitable Fund - Hasson Family Fund: $413,724 · OtherFidelity Charitable Fund - Hasson Family FundIndividual grant recipient: $59,458 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+34 more: $10,416 · OtherCAMP MORASHA INC: $33,615 · Religion+4 more: $2,000 · ReligionHeichal Mordechai Inc: $4,120 · EducationAMUDEI CHESED INC: $1,580 · PhilanthropyHEBRON FUND INC: $460 · PhilanthropyTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $300 · Public BenefitWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $224 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$483,598Religion$35,615Education$4,120Philanthropy$2,040Public Benefit$300Human Services$224Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP MORASHA INC: $33,615 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHeichal Mordechai Inc: $4,120 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $1,580 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTorahAnytimeCom Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH TEMIMAH INC: $640 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $260 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $224 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH SLIFKA CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC: $26 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP MORASHA INC ↗
  • Who funds Heichal Mordechai Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMUDEI CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds TorahAnytimeCom Inc ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORAH TEMIMAH INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH SLIFKA CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundArthur & Sally Dordek…Bitton Family Foundat…The Novick Family Fou…The Howard Ross Famil…Todd a and Raphaela S…Aj & Sl Stern Family …Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Jewish Federation of …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…
Jewish Communal FundNY18.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Arthur & Sally Dordek Charitable Foundation · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · The Novick Family Foundation · The Howard Ross Family Foundation · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hasson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hasson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hasson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home