· Private foundation
The Novick Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $215k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HILLEL TORAH NOR SUB DAY SCHOOL | $115,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LOMZA YESHIVA-PETAH TIKVAH | $50,000 |
| IDA CROWN JEWISH ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| NIEMAN FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| JEWISH UNITED FUND | $20,000 |
| YU KOLLEL TORAH MITZION | $18,000 |
| ETZION FOUNDATION | $18,000 |
| ARIE CROWN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| NCSY | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN | $10,000 |
| CAMP MOSHAVA | $7,500 |
| CHICAGO CHESED FUND | $7,200 |
| CONGREGATION OR TORAH | $6,500 |
| BEIS MEDRISH OF QUEENS | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JUJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO5× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +13%
- KTKOLLEL TORAH MITZION INC3× · 2021–2024 · $38k · revenue +1%
- CCCHICAGO CHESED FUND5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- TCTHE CENTRAL FOUNDATION FOR RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND CULTURAL INSTITUTIONSone grant, 2022 · $40k
- YTYU TORAH MIRION (YESHIVA UNIVERSITY)one grant, 2020 · $10k
- OUORTHODOX UNIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Religious Teaching
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Chazak is a global Jewish organization that inspires, equips, and unites young people through the profound wisdom of the Torah and the rich Sephardic heritage. Within our diverse community, we strive to foster fulfilling lives and…
Religious School
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kollel Torah Mitzion Inc and the most unlike its peers is Healing the Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL TORAH MITZION INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND ↗
- Who funds Beis Midrash of Queens ↗
- Who funds J-LIFE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ↗
- Who funds CONG YESHIVA LOMZA ↗
- Who funds HEALING THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BNEI AKIVA OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds HATZALAH CHICAGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Elliott and Ronni Charitable Fdn · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · Noah Wolff Family Foundation Inc · Lev Zahav NFP · Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago · Crain-Maling Foundation · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Bellows Family Foundation · Walder Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Novick Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Novick Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Novick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.