Skip to content
Hascoe Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hascoe Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2018
16
Grants FY2018
6
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Hascoe Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Hascoe Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $141k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
13
’18
2
’19
0
’20
1
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.4MHealth$158kInternational$30kArts & Culture$15kEducation$7kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k10 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$55,000
FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH$25,000
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$13,500
GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH$10,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$10,000
ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
JINSA$5,000
MIGHTYCAUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$2,500
JDRF$1,000
FUTURE 5$1,000
FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND$1,000
SHATTERPROOF$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILMARK POND FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $172k → 7%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JINSA: $5k → 14%FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 15%GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%MIGHTYCAUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $167k → 7%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JINSA: $5k → 14%FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 15%GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $121k → 7%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $55k → 17%FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH: $25k → 14%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14k → 15%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $111k → 7%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $25k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14k → 15%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $101k → 7%ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $82k → 7%JDRF: $1k → 17%ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%SHATTERPROOF: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $73k → 7%JDRF: $1k → 17%SHATTERPROOF: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $70k → 7%FUTURE 5: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $53k → 7%FUTURE 5: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $51k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $50k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH: $10k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $50k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH: $10k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $42k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $35k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $35k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $31k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $20k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $20k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $15k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $10k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $10k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 12 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$201k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-3%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
HealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +44%
  • UF
    UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +100%
  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -3%
  • GH
    GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uja Federation of Greenwich Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,330,088 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $80,000 · OtherUJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $5,500 · OtherMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $27,000 · HealthFriends of Cancer Research: $25,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $20,000 · Health+5 more: $5,500 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · InternationalJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $10,000 · InternationalADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationFUTURE 5 INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILMARK POND FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,330,088Other$105,500Health$77,500International$30,000Arts & Culture$15,250Education$5,000Youth Development$2,000Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,330,088 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Cancer Research: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILMARK POND FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hascoe Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hascoe Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hascoe’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home