Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hascoe Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2018
16
Grants FY2018
6
States reached
$55k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Hascoe Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Hascoe Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $141k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
17
13
18
2
19
0
20
1
21
0
22
0
23
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.4MHealth$158kInternational$30kArts & Culture$15kEducation$7kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k10 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$55,000
FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH$25,000
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$13,500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$10,000
UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH$10,000
GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
JINSA$5,000
MIGHTYCAUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$2,500
SHATTERPROOF$1,000
JDRF$1,000
FUTURE 5$1,000
FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILMARK POND FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $172k → 7%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JINSA: $5k → 14%FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 15%GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%MIGHTYCAUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $167k → 7%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JINSA: $5k → 14%FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 15%GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $121k → 7%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $55k → 17%FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH: $25k → 14%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14k → 15%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $111k → 7%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $25k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14k → 15%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $101k → 7%ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $82k → 7%JDRF: $1k → 17%ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%SHATTERPROOF: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $73k → 7%JDRF: $1k → 17%SHATTERPROOF: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $70k → 7%FUTURE 5: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $53k → 7%FUTURE 5: $1k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $51k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $50k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH: $10k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $50k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH: $10k → 9%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $42k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $35k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $35k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $31k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $20k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $20k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $15k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $10k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $10k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CO
VA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$201k · 12 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$201k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+4%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
HealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +44%
  • UF
    UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +100%
  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +4%
  • GH
    GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue -24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uja Federation of Greenwich Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,330,088 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $80,000 · OtherUJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $5,500 · OtherMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $27,000 · HealthFriends of Cancer Research — $25,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITAL — $20,000 · Health+5 more — $5,500 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · InternationalJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA — $10,000 · InternationalADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & CultureSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationFUTURE 5 INC — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILMARK POND FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,330,088Other$105,500Health$77,500International$30,000Arts & Culture$15,250Education$5,000Youth Development$2,000Environment$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,330,088 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Cancer Research — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILMARK POND FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hascoe Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation2% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph