Skip to content

· Public charity

Harvey L Miller Supporting Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, and maintain the broad, charitable, educational or religious purposes or functions as authorized by the charter of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago and the by-laws of the foundation.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$7.2MReligion$4.9MEducation$4.8MArts & Culture$4.4MHuman Services$1.1MAnimals$1.0MHealth$435kInternational$256kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$252k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$500,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER$350,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$250,000
CANTORS ASSEMBLY INC$100,000
THE ARK$100,000
SPERTUS INST FOR JEWISH LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP$100,000
SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF METRO CHICAGO$100,000
SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY$100,000
JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$100,000
ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$100,000
THE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES$100,000
THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$75,000
UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA$52,000
CITY OF HOPE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American National Red Cross and Constituent Chapter and Branches: $50k → 14%AMER NATL RED CROSS & CONSTITUENT CHAP & BRANCHES: $25k → 14%AMER NATL RED CROSS & CONSTITUENT CHAP & BRANCHES: $25k → 14%The Ark: $350k → 14%The Ark: $100k → 14%The ARK: $100k → 14%The Ark: $100k → 14%THE ARK: $100k → 14%The Ark: $100k → 14%THE ARK: $100k → 14%The Ark: $100k → 14%The Ark: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 14 repeat orgs$731k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$21M
$581k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+5%

Still filing today

71%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +14%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +13%
  • TA
    THE ARK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $256k · revenue +41%
  • JL
    JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
9
Jewish Community Relations Council of Indianapolis

The Jewish Community Relations Council is the public affairs arm of the organized Jewish community, building consensus on issues of concern, and then communicating those interests to policy makers, faith and ethnic communities, civic…

—
10
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation Council of Greater La; the most unlike its peers is Victory Gardens Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,400,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITA…JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $2,225,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN…THE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $910,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INCTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $575,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH A…+2 more: $150,000 · PhilanthropyROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL: $4,600,000 · EducationROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH …JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $3,090,000 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMIN…CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $700,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $250,000 · OtherCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $385,000 · OtherCANCER WELLNESS CENTERFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $256,000 · Other+7 more: $612,000 · Other+7 moreHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $4,360,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL F…+1 more: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARK: $1,125,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 · Human ServicesSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $1,015,000 · AnimalsCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $500,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$7,260,000Education$4,600,000Other$5,293,000Arts & Culture$4,385,000Human Services$1,225,000Animals$1,015,000Religion$500,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL: $4,600,000 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $4,360,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,400,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $2,225,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARK: $1,125,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $1,015,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $910,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $575,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $500,000 over 9y, 9.2% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $385,000 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $256,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPERTUS INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP: $150,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACK MILLER CENTER FOR TEACHING AMERICA'S FOUNDING PRINCIPLES AND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVictory Gardens Theater: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE ARK ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTOR'S ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds SPERTUS INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE JACK MILLER CENTER FOR TEACHING AMERICA'S FOUNDING PRINCIPLES AND ↗
  • Who funds Victory Gardens Theater ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvey L Miller Supporting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvey L Miller Supporting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harvey L Miller Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harvey L Miller Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvey L Miller Supporting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph