Skip to content
Harvey Family Foundation % Mark Harvey at a glance

· Private foundation

Harvey Family Foundation % Mark Harvey

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.9MEducation$191kFood & Nutrition$50kReligion$28kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$15kRecreation & Sports$13kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$13,655
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
8TH STREET URBAN FARM$50,000
MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECHNOLOGY$35,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND$30,000
PEPPERS RANCH$15,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FUNDATION$13,655
NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC$10,000
34 PROJECT$10,000
HERITAGE HALL SCHOOL$7,500
ONE VETERAN ONE DOG TWO LIVES SAVED$5,000
OHHRF$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PEPPERS RANCH: $15k → 12%34 PROJECT: $10k → 16%34 PROJECT: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MA
OH
PA
RI
UT
VA
MD
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 10 repeat orgs$243k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$1.8M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+46%

Still filing today

30%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +43%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $341k
  • BC
    BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • AH
    ATTAIN HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $88k
  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Drake University

See schedule o.drake's mission is to provide an exceptional learning environment that prepares students for meaningful personal lives, professional accomplishments, and responsible global citizenship. the drake experience is distinguished…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,334,131 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION+1 more: $25,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $341,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONATTAIN HEALTH: $88,253 · OtherATTAIN HEALTH8TH STREET URBAN FARM: $50,000 · Other8TH STREET URBAN FARMBOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $40,000 · OtherBOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FU…+11 more: $60,600 · Other+11 moreMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $165,000 · EducationMassachuse…HERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC: $25,500 · EducationHERITAGE H…+3 more: $12,868 · Education+3 more34 PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH INC: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHonnold Foundation: $5,000 · EnvironmentOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$1,359,131Other$579,853Education$203,368Human Services$36,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,334,131 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $165,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC: $25,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget34 PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHonnold Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL INC: $2,868 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds 34 PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Honnold Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Fred Jones Family Fou…Servant FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…Communities Foundatio…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvey Family Foundation % Mark Harvey funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvey Family Foundation % Mark Harvey. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harvey Family Foundation % Mark Harvey’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home