Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harvest Time Partners Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$209kEducation$139kHuman Services$65kInternational$60kPublic Benefit$41kArts & Culture$35kHealth$30kRecreation & Sports$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,486
Median grant
11
States reached
$619k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Because I Said I Would$15,000
Character Council of Western New York$15,000
Chosen Care$10,294
The Harvest Church$8,500
Orphanos Foundation$6,180
Half a Sorrow Foundation$5,486
Tart Trails Inc$5,000
Rails to Trails Foundation$3,091
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Spirit Life Church of Omaha$516
Individual grant recipient$258
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Chosen Care: $35k → 10%THE KALAMAZOO DREAM CENTER: $1k → 12%ORPHANOS FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES: $8k → 11%Chosen Care: $10k → 10%ORPHANOS FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES: $3k → 11%CHOSEN CARE: $3k → 10%ORPHANOS FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES: $3k → 11%ORPHANOS FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%ORPHANOS FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%Orphanos Foundation: $6k → 17%ORPHANOS FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%Orphanos Foundation: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 21 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$582k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-6%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    Orphanos Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +93%
  • CC
    CHOSEN CARE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $48k · revenue +55%
  • BI
    BECAUSE I SAID I WOULD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $41k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOLTER MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AI
    Alongside Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -6%
  • MF
    MORNINGSTAR FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
3
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
4
PastorServe Inc

Since its founding over twenty years ago, the Organization has used a number of expressions to define its ministry. "Every Pastor Needs a Pastor" has described the underlying purpose of the Organization's ministry since day one. "Healthy…

Religion
5
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
6
Caring Cross Inc

Caring cross is focused upon accelerating the development and implementation of advanced medicines like car-t cell and stem cell gene therapies. in partnership with like-minded stakeholders, caring cross develops and deploys technologies,…

Health
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
9
Christian Leadership Alliance

Christian leadership alliance exists to equip and unite leaders called to transform the world for christ.

—
10
Dualreach

Dualreach furthers the worldwide efforts of the christian church by partnering with other ministries & churches in evangelism ministries.

Religion
11
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
12
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Because I Said I Would; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHARACTER COUNCIL OF WESTERN NY: $90,000 · OtherTHE CHARACTER COUNCIL OF WESTERN NYHARVEST CHURCH: $49,500 · OtherHARVEST CHURCHThe Character Council of Western New York: $45,000 · OtherThe Character Council of Western New YorkTHE BRIDGE CHURCH: $38,700 · OtherTHE BRIDGE CHURCHTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $36,050 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GODHARVEST CHURCH CHARLOTTE: $31,000 · OtherHARVEST CHURCH CHARLOTTEASSEMBLY OF GOD MISSIONARIES: $26,300 · OtherASSEMBLY OF GOD MISSIONARIESPORTAGE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $17,500 · OtherYMCA - KALAMAZOO: $13,500 · Other+20 more: $56,216 · Other+20 moreOrphanos Foundation: $60,400 · Human ServicesOrphanos FoundationCHOSEN CARE INC: $48,293 · Human ServicesCHOSEN CARE INCSoldiers to Sidelines: $12,805 · Human ServicesSoldiers to Sidelines+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesBECAUSE I SAID I WOULD: $40,665 · Public BenefitHALF A SORROW FOUNDATION: $23,951 · HealthJETT FOUNDATION INC: $5,635 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthHOLTER MUSEUM OF ART: $17,745 · Arts & CultureAlongside Inc: $6,033 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $600 · Youth Development
Other$403,766Human Services$122,498Public Benefit$40,665Health$29,836Arts & Culture$17,745Religion$6,033Youth Development$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOrphanos Foundation: $60,400 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHOSEN CARE INC: $48,293 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBECAUSE I SAID I WOULD: $40,665 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHALF A SORROW FOUNDATION: $23,951 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetHOLTER MUSEUM OF ART: $17,745 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSoldiers to Sidelines: $12,805 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAlongside Inc: $6,033 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJETT FOUNDATION INC: $5,635 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNISERVE: $2,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetKalamazoo Dream Center: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARACTER EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Orphanos Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHOSEN CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BECAUSE I SAID I WOULD ↗
  • Who funds HALF A SORROW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLTER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Soldiers to Sidelines ↗
  • Who funds Alongside Inc ↗
  • Who funds JETT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNISERVE ↗
  • Who funds Kalamazoo Dream Center ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARACTER EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvest Time Partners Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvest Time Partners Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harvest Time Partners Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harvest Time Partners Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvest Time Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph