Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harry T & Shirley W Dozor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$125kArts & Culture$95kHealth$89kCivil Rights$34kEducation$30kCommunity Improvement$20kRecreation & Sports$15kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Assoc Ben Gurion Univ$25,000
Community Action Partnership of Sinoma County$20,000
Main Line Art Center$18,000
Community College of Phila$4,000
Operation Smile$4,000
Anti Defamation League$3,500
Golden Slipper Club Camp$3,000
World Jewish Congress$3,000
US Merchant Marine Academy& Alumni Assoc$2,500
Cradles to Crayons$2,000
New Horizon Options in Aging$2,000
Settlement Music School$1,500
Academy of Vocal Arts$1,500
Curtis Institute of Music$1,500
The Tinicum Concervancy$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Cradles to Crayons: $2k → 22%Cradles to Crayons: $2k → 22%Cradles to Crayons: $2k → 22%Cradles to Crayons: $2k → 22%Cradles to Crayons: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 23 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$378k
$34k

Still filing today

74%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    Main Line Art Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $69k · revenue +33%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • AA
    Amer Assoc Ben Gurion Unov
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CC
    Community College of Phila Fdn
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • GS
    Golden Slipper Club Group
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture
2
Philadelphia Chamber Music Society

To engage our community in a life more beautiful through the shared experience and transformative impact of chamber music, by arranging diverse and compelling programs by exceptional artists at affordable prices, and by presenting new…

Arts & Culture
3
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
4
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
5
The Orpheus Club of Philadelphia

The activities conducted by ocp further its exempt purposes because they contribute to the cultural life of philadelphia and preserve and educate the public about the art of vocal music.

Arts & Culture
6
The Philadelphia Orchestra and Kimmel Center Inc

Pokc was formed for charitable and educational purposes and is dedicated to the promotion of the arts.

Arts & Culture
7
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
8
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
9
Baltimore Choral Arts Society Inc

The society was created to support a chorus, which performs public concerts of choral & orchestra music. the mission is to build a stronger, more connected, more inspired community by celebrating the joy of choral music through exceptional…

Arts & Culture
10
Musical Fund Society of Philadelphia

Enriches the musical life of philadelphia through its grants, awards, & performances.

—
11
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
12
Oberlin Choristers

Choristers' mission is to provide the highest quality choral music education and performance opportunities to the culturally and economically diverse children and youth of northeast Ohio.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Academy of Vocal Arts; the most unlike its peers is Integrative Medical Clinic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Assoc Ben Gurion Univ: $100,000 · OtherAmerican Assoc Ben Gurion UnivINTEGRATIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION: $59,000 · OtherINTEGRATIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATIONAmer Assoc Ben Gurion Unov: $25,000 · OtherAmer Assoc Ben Gurion UnovCommunity College of Phila: $16,000 · OtherCommunity College of PhilaWorld Jewish Congress: $15,000 · OtherWorld Jewish CongressCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $31,000 · Other+8 moreMain Line Art Center: $69,000 · Arts & CultureMain Line Art CenterSETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 · Arts & CultureSETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL …THE ACADEMY OF VOCAL ARTS: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ACADEMY OF VOCAL ART…+4 more: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY: $20,000 · Community ImprovementOPERATION SMILE INC: $20,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $18,500 · Civil RightsTINICUM CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC: $3,750 · EnvironmentECO BUCKS INC: $3,750 · EnvironmentGolden Slipper Camp: $12,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$256,000Arts & Culture$93,000Community Improvement$20,000International$20,000Civil Rights$18,500Environment$12,500Recreation & Sports$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMain Line Art Center: $69,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetINTEGRATIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION: $59,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Slipper Camp: $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF VOCAL ARTS: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTINICUM CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetECO BUCKS INC: $3,750 over 5y, 99% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOX AMA DEUS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSS United States Conservancy: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST JERSEY CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH CHORAL ENSEMBLES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Main Line Art Center ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Golden Slipper Camp ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF VOCAL ARTS ↗
  • Who funds TINICUM CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ECO BUCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VOX AMA DEUS ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds SS United States Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds WEST JERSEY CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH CHORAL ENSEMBLES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Neubauer Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Neubauer Family Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry T & Shirley W Dozor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry T & Shirley W Dozor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry T & Shirley W Dozor’s filings →

More from the funding graph