Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry L Rust & Helen M Rust Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$292k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$296kHealth$246kHuman Services$239kFood & Nutrition$188kHousing & Shelter$80kYouth Development$70kArts & Culture$56kCrime & Legal$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $290k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KC-ST JOSEPH INC$25,000
METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY$20,000
STUDENT U$20,000
CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS$20,000
CORNERSTONES OF CARE$20,000
KANSAS CITY DREAM CENTER CO$20,000
LEVELUP KIDS INC$20,000
THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY$20,000
CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS$20,000
ADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC$18,000
COLUMBIA CENTER FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE$15,000
KC COMMON GOOD INC$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JEFFERSON CITY$15,000
WILDWOOD OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER INC$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN SERVICES: $18k → 9%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $20k → 15%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 9%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $15k → 10%INSIGHT HOUSING: $25k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KC-ST JOSEPH INC: $25k → 15%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Harry L Rust & Helen M Rust Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 31% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 35% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Harry L Rust & Helen M Rust Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$377k · 11 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
49

Total granted

$377k
$810k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    3× · 2020–2024 · $58k · revenue +10%
  • BOOK HARVEST
    2× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +122%
  • AJ
    ADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +227%

Funded once

  • IH
    Insight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +88%
  • NB
    NOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
3
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
4
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
5
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
6
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
7
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
8
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
11
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
12
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shawnee Mission Meals On Wheels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportPublic Library OperationsElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Mentoring ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Cancer Support ServicesYouth Development CentersLocal Food System Organizat…Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Youth CampsSchool District FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Developmental Disabilities …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/64
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/61
Grantees still filing
36/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY — $40,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRYALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $32,500 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKLOVED TWICE — $24,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $20,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 · OtherSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $20,000 · OtherEarth Island Institute Inc — $20,000 · OtherCAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC — $20,000 · OtherEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER — $30,000 · OtherNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC — $25,000 · OtherPERSON TO PERSON INC — $20,000 · Other+22 more — $318,000 · Other+22 moreBOOK HARVEST — $42,250 · EducationBOOK HARVESTADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC — $36,000 · EducationADAM J LEWIS ACAD…STUDENT U — $33,000 · EducationSTUDENT UDURHAM LITERACY CENTER INC — $20,000 · EducationDURHAM LITERACY C…BAY AREA URBAN DEBATE COMMISSION — $15,000 · EducationBAY AREA URBAN DE…MINDDRIVE INCORPORATED — $15,000 · EducationMINDDRIVE INCORPO…DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $12,000 · EducationDURHAM PUBLIC SCH…SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $10,500 · EducationPIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationDonnelly College — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationLEVELUP KIDS INC — $37,500 · HealthLEVELUP KIDS IN…SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC — $33,000 · HealthSAMUEL U RODGER…CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER — $25,000 · HealthCONTRA COSTA CR…The Children's Mercy Hospital — $20,000 · HealthThe Children's …PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…EL FUTURO INC — $20,000 · HealthEL FUTURO INCStreet Level Health Project — $15,000 · HealthStreet Level He…Bay Area Young Survivors — $15,000 · HealthBay Area Young …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHAR…Insight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project — $25,000 · Human ServicesInsight Housi…MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRIS…LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE CO…CORNERSTONES OF CARE — $20,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES …Forget Me Not Childrens Services — $17,500 · Human ServicesForget Me Not…LEND A HAND FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesLEND A HAND F…FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $15,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE F…HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $57,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $17,500 · Food & NutritionKansas City Dream Center Co — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC — $17,500 · Housing & ShelterCAMP CLAIRE INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentWALLTOWN CHILDRENS THEATRE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCYCLES OF CHANGE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JEFFERSON CITY — $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$589,500Education$208,750Health$185,500Human Services$162,500Food & Nutrition$95,000Housing & Shelter$77,500Youth Development$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $57,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOOK HARVEST — $42,250 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEVELUP KIDS INC — $37,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSTUDENT U — $33,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC — $33,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInsight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP CLAIRE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCORNERSTONES OF CARE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL FUTURO INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetDURHAM LITERACY CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 81% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KENNEDY COLLECTIVE INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetForget Me Not Childrens Services — $17,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDE LA SALLE EDUCATION CENTER — $17,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSCRAP EXCHANGE INC — $16,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALPHAPOINTE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALLTOWN CHILDRENS THEATRE — $15,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetBERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBAY AREA URBAN DEBATE COMMISSION — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCYCLES OF CHANGE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JEFFERSON CITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDZNOTES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetStreet Level Health Project — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBay Area Young Survivors — $15,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetINSPIRICA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…Health Forward Founda…Oppenstein Brothers F…Greater Kansas City C…Constance M Cooper Ch…Jackson County Commun…William T Kemper Foun…Duke UniversityFairfield County's Co…The Near and Far Asso…Ewing Marion Kauffman…Synchrony Foundation
United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO28.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Health Forward Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Constance M Cooper Charitable Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Duke University · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Synchrony Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry L Rust & Helen M Rust Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • The Kennedy Collective Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Community Services Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harry L Rust & Helen M Rust Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harry L Rust & Helen M Rust Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home