How much does Harry H Beren Foundation Dib give?

Harry H Beren Foundation Dib reported 34 grants totaling $102,999 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 31 and 35 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.

What does Harry H Beren Foundation Dib fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (68%), Education (7%), International (6%).

Who are Harry H Beren Foundation Dib's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Beth Medrash Govoha of America ($168k), Congregation Yeshiva Kesser Torah ($34k), Ner Israel Rabbinical College Inc ($31k).

Does Harry H Beren Foundation Dib fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 9% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Harry H Beren Foundation Dib accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Harry H Beren Foundation Dib?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Harry H Beren Foundation Zb, Jewish Communal Fund, The Ojc Fund.

Where is Harry H Beren Foundation Dib based?

Harry H Beren Foundation Dib is based in CO.

Harry H Beren Foundation Dib

Harry H Beren Foundation Dib at a glance

· Private foundation

Harry H Beren Foundation Dib

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$38k

Largest

01What it funds

0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$419kEducation$41kInternational$35kHealth$27kPhilanthropy$1kArts & Culture$500Other$0

02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k33 grants · $65k
$10k–50k1 grant · $38k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.4M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICA	$37,860
YESHIVA GEDOLAH KESSER TORAH	$7,500
Individual grant recipient	$7,000
NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE	$4,900
RABINICAL COLLEGE OF TELSHE	$4,900
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY	$4,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL	$3,800
Individual grant recipient	$3,600
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA	$3,600
YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM INC	$3,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PONEVEZ YESHIVA	$3,500
TORAH SCHOOLS FOR ISRAEL	$3,300
MESIVTHA TIFERET JERUSALEM	$3,300
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM	$1,800
KOLLEL ATERES MORDECHAI	$1,400

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$587k · 39 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$587k

$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+24%

Still filing today

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalEducationReligionPhilanthropyOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RC
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF TELSHE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +119%
YU
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +41%
AC
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +50%

Funded once

OS
OHEL SARAH INSTITUTE FOR THE
one grant, 2020 · $1k
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH INC
one grant, 2021 · $1k
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2020 · $500

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International

Sherit Isroel

—

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—

Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education

Ziv Israel Association

—

Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation

Philanthropy

Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education

American Friends of Torat Eliyahu

Philanthropy

American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah

—

Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Dmir Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys Town Jerusalem Foundation of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/16

Grantees still filing

12/16

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$486,033International$65,020Education$51,400Religion$12,800Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harry H Beren Foundation ZbCO32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harry H Beren Foundation Zb · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Sheldon K Beren Charitable Trust · Ays Tzedakah Foundation · JEWISHColorado · Rose Community Foundation · Mb Glassman Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Federation of Cleveland

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry H Beren Foundation Dib funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry H Beren Foundation Dib. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harry H Beren Foundation Dib?

Find your warmest path to Harry H Beren Foundation Dib through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Harry H Beren Foundation Dib’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home