Skip to content
Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$3.0MHuman Services$2.6MEducation$963kYouth Development$850kHousing & Shelter$800kFood & Nutrition$570kRecreation & Sports$465kArts & Culture$340kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 57 grants below total $1,738,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,270,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $531,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $350k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
West Texas Rehabilitation Center$250,000
Marbridge Foundation$150,000
The Salvation Army Austin Area Command$50,000
Project Mend, Inc.$50,000
Downtown Womens Center$50,000
Half Hann Foundation$50,000
Settlement Home For Children$40,000
Junior League of Austin$40,000
Down Home Ranch Inc$40,000
Helping Hand Home for Children$35,000
Age of Central Texas$35,000
Foster Angels of Central Texas$34,000
Phoenix House of Texas, Inc.$30,000
YWCA of Greater Austin$30,000
Austin Parks Foundation$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $50k → 10%DOWN HOME RANCH: $100k → 12%SUMMERHOUSE HOUSTON: $25k → 16%DOWN HOME RANCH: $100k → 12%DOWN HOME RANCH: $75k → 12%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC: $30k → 16%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $50k → 12%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $34k → 20%DOWN HOME RANCH: $40k → 12%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $25k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $25k → 10%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $50k → 6%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $25k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $25k → 10%CLAYON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $35k → 14%CLAYON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $35k → 14%AGE OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $60k → 10%AGE OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25k → 10%AGE OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25k → 10%AGE OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25k → 10%GIRLS EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $50k → 10%GENAUSTIN: $30k → 10%HAND TO HOLD: $50k → 10%HAND TO HOLD: $50k → 10%HEAING WITH HORSES RANCH: $40k → 10%HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $30k → 10%HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $25k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $125k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $75k → 10%GENAUSTIN: $30k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $30k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $30k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $60k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $60k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $60k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $50k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $50k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $40k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES: $30k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE: $50k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE: $30k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%THE MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 81 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

81 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
49

Total granted

$10M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+8%

Still filing today

83%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +23%
  • TW
    The West Texas Rehabilitation Center
    3× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +34%
  • RR
    ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • CE
    Casa Esperanza Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +29%
  • BI
    BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -37%
  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER FDN
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
3
Any Baby Can of Austin Inc

Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…

—
4
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
5
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
Austin Child Guidance Center

To improve the mental health of children and their families through early intervention, diagnosis, and treatment to help them develop the emotional skills for meeting life's challenges.

—
8
Achievement Center of Texas Inc

Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.

Human Services
9
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
10
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
11
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
12
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Child Protection; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation At Shield Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/109
Grantees still filing
68/109
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $240,000 · OtherANY BABY CAN: $200,000 · OtherDELL CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER: $175,000 · OtherTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $215,000 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $235,000 · OtherAustin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles: $215,000 · OtherRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $185,000 · Other+77 more: $3,630,500 · Other+77 moreMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 · Human ServicesMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INCDOWN HOME RANCH INC: $405,000 · Human ServicesDOWN HOME RANCH INCFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $264,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS…HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $260,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN…AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $170,000 · Human ServicesWonders & Worries Inc: $165,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUSTIN: $150,000 · Human ServicesHAND TO HOLD: $140,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesHEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $115,000 · Human Services+25 more: $960,236 · Human Services+25 moreThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $500,000 · HealthThe West Tex…THE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $280,000 · HealthTHE SETTLEME…Half-Helen Foundation: $235,000 · HealthHalf-Helen F…Casa Esperanza Inc: $100,000 · HealthCasa Esperan…Phoenix Houses of Texas Inc: $80,000 · HealthPhoenix Hous…PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $65,000 · HealthProject MEND: $50,000 · Health+3 more: $65,000 · HealthROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $500,000 · Recreation & SportsCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Recreation & SportsRISE ADVENTURES INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP: $80,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsBREAKTHROUGH: $200,000 · EducationMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $141,100 · EducationTHE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN: $115,000 · EducationE3 ALLIANCE: $65,000 · EducationBookSpring: $60,000 · EducationLITERACY COALITION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $50,000 · EducationCon Mi MADRE: $25,000 · EducationTodos Juntos Learning Center: $25,000 · Education+4 more: $47,500 · EducationCenter for Women and Their Work Inc: $190,000 · Arts & CultureCreative Action: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSAGE STUDIO & GALLERY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAnthropos Arts: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $40,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOUNDATION AT SHIELD RANCH: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $35,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,095,500Human Services$3,354,236Health$1,375,000Recreation & Sports$920,000Education$728,600Arts & Culture$430,000Youth Development$415,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $500,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $500,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetDOWN HOME RANCH INC: $405,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $280,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $264,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $260,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $240,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $235,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHalf-Helen Foundation: $235,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $215,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetAustin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles: $215,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $200,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCenter for Women and Their Work Inc: $190,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $185,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $170,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWonders & Worries Inc: $165,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION AT SHIELD RANCH: $150,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $141,100 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMIRACLE FARM INC: $140,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $140,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHAND TO HOLD: $140,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $135,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $125,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $125,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $120,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetBetter ATX: $120,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $115,000 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetTHE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN: $115,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $110,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGENAUSTIN: $110,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $105,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMark Kilroy Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCasa Esperanza Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetRISE ADVENTURES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $95,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA: $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPhoenix Houses of Texas Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP: $80,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCreative Action: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $70,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetE3 ALLIANCE: $65,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY MEDICAL MINISTRIESINC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN HOME RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SETTLEMENT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds Half-Helen Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds Center for Women and Their Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds Wonders & Worries Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION AT SHIELD RANCH ↗
  • Who funds MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds HAND TO HOLD ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ELDERCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS ↗
  • Who funds Better ATX ↗
  • Who funds HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH ↗
  • Who funds THE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…St David's FoundationThe Moody FoundationUnited Way for Greate…Topfer Family Foundat…Ecg FoundationBetter Business BureauCarl C Anderson Sr an…The Webber Family Fou…Shield-Ayres Foundati…The Applied Materials…The Powell Foundation
Austin Community Foundation IncTX99.2× affinity57 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Topfer Family Foundation · Ecg Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Webber Family Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · The Applied Materials Foundation · The Powell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.4M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home