Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$524k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
25
Organizations funded FY2023
64%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$461,461
Organizations funded a year
14 to 25
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$20M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 64% of the organizations Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 11% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
InternationalReligionArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$524k36%
FY202325$778k64%
FY202223$1.1M52%
FY202119$614k63%
FY202014$558kn/a
83% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Science & Tech$2.5MArts & Culture$454kReligion$430kEducation$210kInternational$58kHuman Services$36kPhilanthropy$27kHealth$14kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc$454,00021%
Yeshiva University$153,45050%
Jewish Soul Inc$64,900415%
The Machon Inc$40,000225%
Torah Live Inc$30,00021%
Mesorah Heritage Foundation$30,00010%
Central Fund of Israel$30,00010%
Golden Network$23,250510%
National Council of Young Israel$18,0003n/a
Denver Jewish Day School$16,50020%
Show all 36 grantees
All grantees of Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc$454,00021%
Yeshiva University$153,45050%
Jewish Soul Inc$64,900415%
The Machon Inc$40,000225%
Torah Live Inc$30,00021%
Mesorah Heritage Foundation$30,00010%
Central Fund of Israel$30,00010%
Golden Network$23,250510%
National Council of Young Israel$18,0003n/a
Denver Jewish Day School$16,50020%
Ezer Mizion$13,00020%
Emet Outreach$12,00020%
America Israel Democracy Coalition$10,00010%
American Friends of Lema'An Achai$10,00011%
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$10,00010%
Yad Henna Sara Inc Dba Aishel$10,0001n/a
Shaloh School Oholei Torah$8,0001n/a
Hakshiva Inc$7,50012%
Yad Yisroel$5,00010%
Tikva Corp$5,00010%
Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year$5,00010%
American Friends of Kehillas Shivtei Yeshurun Inc$3,00012%
Southeast Hebrew Congregation$2,5001n/a
Ne Eman Foundation USA$1,80010%
Yeshiva Har Torah$1,62020%
American Friends of Hatzolah Beit Shemesh Inc$1,5001n/a
National Council of Young Israel$1,0001n/a
Israel EMS Foundation$1,0001n/a
Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc$1,00010%
The Shalem Foundation$1,00010%
Hebrew Free Loan Society Inc$50010%
Hebrew Academy of Nassau County$5001n/a
National Jewish Outreach Program In$50010%
Sharsheret Inc$50010%
Congregation Ohr Hatorah Inc$3601n/a
West Side Institutional Synagogue$1801n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.6M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of United Hatzalah Inc: $454,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYeshiva University: $153,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Soul Inc: $64,900 over 4y, 15% of budgetThe Machon Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetTorah Live Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMesorah Heritage Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGolden Network: $23,250 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetDenver Jewish Day School: $16,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEzer Mizion: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEmet Outreach: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerica Israel Democracy Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Lema'An Achai: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHakshiva Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetYad Yisroel: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTikva Corp: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Kehillas Shivtei Yeshurun Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNe Eman Foundation USA: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Har Torah: $1,620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommittee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shalem Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Free Loan Society Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Jewish Outreach Program In: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY30.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Ojc Fund · Alyad Foundation Inc · Hyman & Ann Arbesfeld Foundation Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation

How much does Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation give?
Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $523,511 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 25 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (66%), Arts & Culture (12%), Religion (12%).
Who are Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Friends of United Hatzalah Inc ($454k), Yeshiva University ($153k), Jewish Soul Inc ($65k).
Does Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 64% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, The Ojc Fund.
Where is Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation based?
Harry and Jane Fischel Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry and Jane Fischel’s filings →

More from the funding graph