Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harry & Jan Sweere Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$6.5MInternational$4.7MEducation$3.0MHealth$3.0MHuman Services$2.8MRecreation & Sports$2.6MYouth Development$745kHousing & Shelter$480kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.2M
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church$1,219,371
Project Video$420,000
Venture$301,000
Camp Omega$279,000
Franciscan Brothers of Peace$225,000
The Center for Victims of Torture$220,000
Show Hope Inc$200,000
The Sanneh Foundation$100,000
Catholic Charities$85,000
Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network$80,000
Pregnancy Choices For Lifecare$79,000
Edify$75,000
Campus Faith Clubs$72,000
Prenatal Partners For Life$70,000
Hope Academy$65,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Dwelling Place: $10k → 7%Choices Womens Center: $5k → 8%Option 1 Women's Health Center: $10k → 13%Superman Sam's Survival Kit: $5k → 7%Superman Sam's Survival Kit: $5k → 7%Veterans Small Business Foundation: $50k → 11%Support Homeless Veterans: $5k → 7%Veterans Small Business Foundation: $5k → 11%Veterans Small Business Foundation: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Homes: $10k → 11%Wounded Warrior Homes: $10k → 11%Prenatal Partners For Life: $70k → 11%Prenatal Partners For Life: $70k → 11%Prenatal Partners For Life: $70k → 11%Prenatal Partners For Life: $70k → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $10k → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $7k → 11%Union Gospel Mission Twin Cities: $5k → 14%Together for Good: $900k → 14%Project Got You Back: $5k → 11%Together for Good: $80k → 14%Project Got Your Back: $5k → 11%Together for Good: $70k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
SD
OH
PA
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Harry & Jan Sweere Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 61%.

Harry & Jan Sweere Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 45 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
55

Total granted

$23M
$786k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+13%

Still filing today

56%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $372k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PROJECT VIDEO INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +77% · 70% of their budget
  • LI
    LUTHERAN ISLAND CAMP INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +195%
  • AH
    Anselm House
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +236%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -40%
  • F
    FILMNORTH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
3
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
4
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
5
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
6
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
7
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
8
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Isaiah House Inc

Isaiah house strives to help individuals struggling with general life challenges, specifically substance abuse and addiction by providing a christian, faith-based intervention and recovery residential treatment program. the goal is to…

Health
11
House of Charity

Feed those in need, house those experiencing homelessness, and empower individuals to achieve independence.

—
12
Bread of Life Mission

Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify; the most unlike its peers is Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
40/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church: $5,927,016 · OtherOur Lady of Peace Catholic ChurchCAMP OMEGA INC: $1,315,000 · OtherCAMP OMEGA INCAnselm House: $1,130,000 · OtherAnselm HouseFRANCISCAN BROTHERS OF PEACE INC: $1,125,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN BROTHERS OF PEACE INCVENTURE: $1,029,000 · OtherVENTURE+69 more: $4,491,500 · Other+69 moreSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $1,125,000 · Human ServicesSHAOHANNAHS…TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $1,050,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FO…PRENATAL PARTNERS FOR LIFE INC: $280,000 · Human ServicesPRENATAL PA…+9 more: $152,000 · Human Services+9 moreNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $1,725,000 · EducationNORTHWEST…HOPE ACADEMY INC: $350,000 · EducationHOPE ACAD…+2 more: $30,000 · EducationPROJECT VIDEO INC: $1,458,300 · ReligionCAMPUS FAITH CLUBS: $303,000 · Religion+2 more: $29,000 · ReligionTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $650,000 · InternationalCHALICE OF MERCY INC: $340,000 · InternationalEdify: $315,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · International+7 more: $43,500 · InternationalLUTHERAN ISLAND CAMP INC: $1,210,000 · Recreation & Sports7 BELLS: $225,000 · HealthTERRI SCHIAVO LIFE & HOPE NETWORK INC: $80,000 · HealthJACK'S BASKET: $75,000 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $50,000 · HealthPROTEZ FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $25,000 · Health+3 more: $19,000 · Health
Other$15,017,516Human Services$2,607,000Education$2,105,000Religion$1,790,300International$1,398,500Recreation & Sports$1,210,000Health$504,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $1,725,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetPROJECT VIDEO INC: $1,458,300 over 5y, 70% of budgetLUTHERAN ISLAND CAMP INC: $1,210,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetAnselm House: $1,130,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $1,125,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTOGETHER FOR GOOD: $1,050,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetVENTURE: $1,029,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $650,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION: $355,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $350,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCHALICE OF MERCY INC: $340,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetEdify: $315,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCAMPUS FAITH CLUBS: $303,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetPRENATAL PARTNERS FOR LIFE INC: $280,000 over 4y, 44% of budget7 BELLS: $225,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetREBUILD UKRAINE: $185,000 over 3y, 56% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $125,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTERRI SCHIAVO LIFE & HOPE NETWORK INC: $80,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetJACK'S BASKET: $75,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetProject Got Your Back: $70,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetCORNERHOUSE: $60,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFILMNORTH: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CELTIC SAINTS: $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSPIRIT RECOVERY CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetPROTEZ FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE SHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR HOMES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUPERMAN SAM'S SURVIVAL KIT: $10,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHS HOUSE OPTION 1 WOMENS HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dwelling Place: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORT HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP FOR MISSION AS TRANSFORMATION-INFEMIT: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCUMBERLAND HEIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NVLD PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWATERORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDEN PEOPLEPLANET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VIDEO INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ISLAND CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Anselm House ↗
  • Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds VENTURE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALICE OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗
  • Who funds CAMPUS FAITH CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds PRENATAL PARTNERS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds 7 BELLS ↗
  • Who funds REBUILD UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TERRI SCHIAVO LIFE & HOPE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JACK'S BASKET ↗
  • Who funds Project Got Your Back ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN22.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · American Gift Fund · Servant Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry & Jan Sweere Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry & Jan Sweere Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harry & Jan Sweere Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harry & Jan Sweere Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry & Jan Sweere’s filings →

More from the funding graph