Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$364k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MArts & Culture$439kEnvironment$369kHealth$248kScience & Tech$232kReligion$185kPhilanthropy$149kHuman Services$144kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $262k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$50,000
VFIC$41,000
VMFA FOUNDATION$25,000
University of Richmond$25,000
First Presbyterian Church$22,500
Big Oak Ranch$20,000
University of Virginia$20,000
University of Richmond$20,000
Warm Springs Presbyterian Church$16,000
Bath County Arts Association$11,000
VCU Institute for Contemporary Art$11,000
Children's Hospital Foundation$10,000
The Doorways$10,000
Bath County Christmas Mother$10,000
Healthnetwork Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Delivering Good: $1k → 17%Big Oak Ranch: $20k → 13%Healthnetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Blessings in a Backpack: $1k → 15%Big Oak Ranch: $15k → 13%Interpeting Freedom Foundation: $2k → 10%Healthnetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Bath County Christmas Mother: $10k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $15k → 13%Healthnetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Bath County Christmas Mother: $10k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $10k → 13%Healthnetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Bath County Christmas Mother: $10k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $10k → 13%Healthnetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Bath County Christmas Mother: $10k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $5k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $5k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $5k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $3k → 13%Bath County Christmas Mother: $1k → 13%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%Drive to Work: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
KY
VA
NM
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 91%.

Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris IIIlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 44 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
25

Total granted

$2.6M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+10%

Still filing today

41%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +10%
  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +105%
  • HC
    HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • VF
    Virginia Foundation for
    one grant, 2024 · $47k
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -2%
  • BC
    Bath County Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
3
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
6
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
7
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
10
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
11
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
12
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delivering Good Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Khaled Hosseini Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VMFA FOUNDATION: $425,000 · OtherVMFA FOUNDATIONUVA JEFFERSON SCHOLAR FOUNDATION: $375,000 · OtherUVA JEFFERSON SCHOLAR FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $314,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYVFIC: $234,500 · OtherVFICVA Found for Ind Colleges: $156,050 · OtherVA Found for Ind CollegesWARM SPRINGS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $90,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $80,000 · Other+38 more: $614,046 · Other+38 moreUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $255,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF R…HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $62,500 · EducationHAMPDEN-SYDNEY …ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $51,000 · EducationST CHRISTOPHER'…Washington and Lee University: $35,000 · EducationWashington and …+3 more: $11,500 · EducationBIG OAK RANCH INC: $87,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBATH COUNTY CHRISTMAS MOTHER INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesDrive to Work: $9,000 · Human Services+2 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION: $34,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $10,000 · HealthTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $9,000 · HealthFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthTHE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBATH COUNTY ARTS ASSOCIATION: $19,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSTEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureART 180 Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGARTH NEWEL MUSIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWARM SPRINGS CEMETERY INC: $10,500 · Membership BenefitVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,289,096Education$415,000Human Services$190,000Health$60,000Arts & Culture$56,000Membership Benefit$10,500Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $314,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $255,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $87,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $62,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBATH COUNTY CHRISTMAS MOTHER INC: $41,000 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBATH COUNTY ARTS ASSOCIATION: $19,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM INC: $11,500 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetWARM SPRINGS CEMETERY INC: $10,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDrive to Work: $9,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORFOLK COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMINARY FOR THE THIRD MILLENNIUM: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetART 180 Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOLLING HAXALL HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBath County Historical Society Inc: $3,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGARTH NEWEL MUSIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBATH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KHALED HOSSEINI FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDELIVERING GOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BATH COUNTY CHRISTMAS MOTHER INC ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BATH COUNTY ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds WARM SPRINGS CEMETERY INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Drive to Work ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Guilford Foundation · Virginia Hot Springs Preservation Trust Inc · Few Acres Foundation · Pistell Family Foundation · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Commonwealth Foundations · Herndon Foundation · The Beirne Carter Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III?

    Find your warmest path to Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harris Foundation co Hiter Harris III’s filings →

    More from the funding graph