Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harrington Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$469k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$8.4MHealth$1.1MArts & Culture$293kAnimals$251kYouth Development$146kPhilanthropy$132kEnvironment$112kFood & Nutrition$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $365k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$50,000
UCSF FOUNDATION-CAROL FRANC BUCK$40,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$40,000
WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK$40,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$34,875
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST$25,000
MAGDALENA ECKE FAMILY YMCA$20,000
LUCIENTE$20,000
DEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$20,000
OCEANA$20,000
AUSTIN FILM SOCIETY$15,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN$10,000
CAL MATTERS$10,000
KQED EDUCATION$10,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUCIENTE: $20k → 18%MAGDALENA ECKE FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 11%DEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $20k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CA
NM
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 27 repeat orgs$466k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
22

Total granted

$5.4M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+21%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $354k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $650k · revenue +37%
  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $231k · revenue +302%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATIVE VOTERS EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +218%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
2
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blacksmith Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Buda Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
29/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,985,559 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR …+3 more: $55,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING FUND: $3,220,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING FUND+52 more: $1,288,428 · Other+52 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $649,857 · HealthCancer Angels of San Diego: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $25,000 · Health+2 more: $2,750 · HealthWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $230,875 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $10,000 · AnimalsGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $80,500 · Arts & CultureMUSIC FOR MINORS INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureFilm Society of Austin Inc: $15,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureDEL MAR FOUNDATION: $56,200 · Community ImprovementSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Community ImprovementDEL MAR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentAmazon Watch Inc: $11,750 · EnvironmentElakha Alliance: $10,000 · Environment
Education$5,040,559Other$4,508,428Health$727,607Animals$240,875Arts & Culture$163,000Community Improvement$111,200Environment$101,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,985,559 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $649,857 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $230,875 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $80,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALEARN: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDEL MAR FOUNDATION: $56,200 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCancer Angels of San Diego: $50,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetMUSIC FOR MINORS INC: $50,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNEW TEACHER CENTER: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCalMatters: $40,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOS ALTOS ROTARY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $40,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $38,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS DMCC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $11,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KIDS KINGDOM: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetINDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEL MAR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKSMITH INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC WILL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEARN ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Angels of San Diego ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC FOR MINORS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW TEACHER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CalMatters ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ALTOS ROTARY ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS DMCC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCIENTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Film Society of Austin Inc ↗
  • Who funds Amazon Watch Inc ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Applied Materials Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Reddere Foundation CO Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Leo M Shortino Family Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harrington Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harrington Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Elakha Alliance: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harrington Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harrington Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harrington Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph