Skip to content
Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$66kEnvironment$37kReligion$35kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$18kInternational$9kCommunity Improvement$8kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$804k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREENVILLE$10,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$2,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC$2,500
UPSTATE FOREVER$2,500
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$2,000
SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC$2,000
ABUNDANCE CAPITAL$2,000
ABUNDANCE CAPITAL$2,000
TRIUNE MERCY CENTER$1,500
TREES GREENVILLE INC$1,500
ARYALOKA BUDDHIST CENTER INC$1,000
THE TRIRATNA BUDDHIST COMMUNITY NEW YORK CITY INC$1,000
VALLEY OUTREACH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%SF NEW DEAL: $2k → 10%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $10k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $2k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $2k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES D-B-A CDS: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES D-B-A CDS: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 23 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$163k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+40%

Still filing today

87%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UPSTATE FOREVER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +288%
  • SJ
    ST JAMES INFIRMARY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +59%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BUDDIST CENTER TRIRATNA
    5× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • BS
    Big Share Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF BIG SURgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
6
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
7
Aclu Foundation of Southern California

See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through litigation, policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil…

Civil Rights
8
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—
9
Abundant San Francisco

To support effective government policies in San Francisco

—
10
San Francisco Drug Users Union Dba Health Initiatives forthe Tenderloin

San Francisco Drug Users Union advocates at the local, state, and federal level forthe protection and promotion of the health and wellness of people who use drugs.

Health
11
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trees Greenville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $8,000 · OtherFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPS…A Child's Haven Inc: $7,000 · OtherA Child's Haven IncMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $7,000 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDRENAID Upstate Inc: $6,000 · OtherAID Upstate IncSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $5,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERFRIENDS OF THE WESTERN BUDDHIST ORDER BAY AREA: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WESTERN BUDDHIST ORDER B…Individual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRIST CHURCH: $3,500 · OtherTHE TRIRATNA BUDDHIST COMMUNITY NEW YORK CITY INC: $3,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF BIG SUR: $2,500 · OtherKARUNA USA INC: $9,000 · OtherKARUNA USA INC+11 more: $14,500 · Other+11 moreUPSTATE FOREVER: $20,000 · EnvironmentUPSTATE FOREVERSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentSOUTH CAROLINA E…TREES GREENVILLE: $3,000 · EnvironmentTREES GREENVILLEYMCA OF GREENVILLE: $10,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREENV…CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $8,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEV…MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $6,000 · Human ServicesMILL VILLAGE M…Valley Outreach: $2,000 · Human ServicesValley Outreac…SF New Deal: $1,500 · Human ServicesSF New DealST JAMES INFIRMARY: $17,000 · HealthST JAMES INFI…QUEER LIFE SPACE INC: $8,000 · HealthQUEER LIFE SP…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…ABUNDANCE CAPITAL: $7,000 · PhilanthropyABUNDANCE CA…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNIT…TRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $11,500 · Food & NutritionTRIUNE ME…Big Share Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionBig Share…HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $2,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST H…SAN FRANCISCO BUDDIST CENTER TRIRATNA: $11,000 · ReligionARYALOKA BUDDHIST CENTER INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$74,500Environment$32,000Human Services$27,500Health$25,000Philanthropy$24,500Food & Nutrition$18,500Religion$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPSTATE FOREVER: $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST JAMES INFIRMARY: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BUDDIST CENTER TRIRATNA: $11,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetKARUNA USA INC: $9,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetQUEER LIFE SPACE INC: $8,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetABUNDANCE CAPITAL: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAID Upstate Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Share Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetTREES GREENVILLE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF BIG SUR: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetValley Outreach: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDU NORD FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSF New Deal: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Maxwell Clinic: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours St Francis Health System Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jolley FoundationScsymmes FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Yeargin FoundationUnited Way of Greenvi…Hayne Hipp FoundationThe Maddrey FoundationJohn I Smith Charitie…Bill and Connie Timmo…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Charles Timmons Found…Prisma Health-Upstate
The Jolley FoundationNV26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Yeargin Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Hayne Hipp Foundation · The Maddrey Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Prisma Health-Upstate

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold F Gallivan Jr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home