Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$66kEnvironment$37kReligion$35kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$18kInternational$9kCommunity Improvement$8kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$804k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREENVILLE$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC$2,500
UPSTATE FOREVER$2,500
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$2,500
SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC$2,000
ABUNDANCE CAPITAL$2,000
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$2,000
ABUNDANCE CAPITAL$2,000
TREES GREENVILLE INC$1,500
TRIUNE MERCY CENTER$1,500
ARYALOKA BUDDHIST CENTER INC$1,000
VALLEY OUTREACH$1,000
THE TRIRATNA BUDDHIST COMMUNITY NEW YORK CITY INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%SF NEW DEAL: $2k → 10%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $10k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $2k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $2k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES D-B-A CDS: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES D-B-A CDS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$163k · 23 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$163k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+40%

Still filing today

87%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UPSTATE FOREVER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +111%
  • SJ
    ST JAMES INFIRMARY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +59%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BUDDIST CENTER TRIRATNA
    5× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • BS
    Big Share Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF BIG SURgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
6
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
7
Aclu Foundation of Southern California

See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through litigation, policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil…

Civil Rights
8
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—
9
Abundant San Francisco

To support effective government policies in San Francisco

—
10
San Francisco Drug Users Union Dba Health Initiatives forthe Tenderloin

San Francisco Drug Users Union advocates at the local, state, and federal level forthe protection and promotion of the health and wellness of people who use drugs.

Health
11
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trees Greenville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%7%<5yr12%10%5–10yr15%14%10–20yr24%24%20–35yr9%28%35–55yr19%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%9%<5yr12%6%5–10yr15%14%10–20yr24%32%20–35yr9%19%35–55yr19%21%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
3,449/28,754

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC — $8,000 · OtherFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPS…MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN — $7,000 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDRENA Child's Haven Inc — $7,000 · OtherA Child's Haven IncAID Upstate Inc — $6,000 · OtherAID Upstate IncSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $5,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERFRIENDS OF THE WESTERN BUDDHIST ORDER BAY AREA — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WESTERN BUDDHIST ORDER B…Individual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRIST CHURCH — $3,500 · OtherTHE TRIRATNA BUDDHIST COMMUNITY NEW YORK CITY INC — $3,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF BIG SUR — $2,500 · OtherKARUNA USA INC — $9,000 · OtherKARUNA USA INC+11 more — $14,500 · Other+11 moreUPSTATE FOREVER — $20,000 · EnvironmentUPSTATE FOREVERSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC — $9,000 · EnvironmentSOUTH CAROLINA E…TREES GREENVILLE — $3,000 · EnvironmentTREES GREENVILLEYMCA OF GREENVILLE — $10,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREENV…CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $8,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEV…MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES — $6,000 · Human ServicesMILL VILLAGE M…Valley Outreach — $2,000 · Human ServicesValley Outreac…SF New Deal — $1,500 · Human ServicesSF New DealST JAMES INFIRMARY — $17,000 · HealthST JAMES INFI…QUEER LIFE SPACE INC — $8,000 · HealthQUEER LIFE SP…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $12,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…ABUNDANCE CAPITAL — $7,000 · PhilanthropyABUNDANCE CA…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNIT…TRIUNE MERCY CENTER — $11,500 · Food & NutritionTRIUNE ME…Big Share Inc — $5,000 · Food & NutritionBig Share…HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $2,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST H…SAN FRANCISCO BUDDIST CENTER TRIRATNA — $11,000 · ReligionARYALOKA BUDDHIST CENTER INC — $1,000 · Religion
Other$74,500Environment$32,000Human Services$27,500Health$25,000Philanthropy$24,500Food & Nutrition$18,500Religion$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPSTATE FOREVER — $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST JAMES INFIRMARY — $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER — $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BUDDIST CENTER TRIRATNA — $11,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetKARUNA USA INC — $9,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC — $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetQUEER LIFE SPACE INC — $8,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc — $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetABUNDANCE CAPITAL — $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAID Upstate Inc — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES — $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBig Share Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREES GREENVILLE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF BIG SUR — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDU NORD FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetValley Outreach — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSF New Deal — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharlotte Maxwell Clinic — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBon Secours St Francis Health System Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jolley FoundationScsymmes FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Yeargin FoundationUnited Way of Greenvi…Hayne Hipp FoundationThe Maddrey FoundationJohn I Smith Charitie…Bill and Connie Timmo…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Charles Timmons Found…Prisma Health-Upstate
The Jolley FoundationNV26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Yeargin Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Hayne Hipp Foundation · The Maddrey Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Prisma Health-Upstate

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harold F Gallivan Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home