Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold C and Janet A Baldauf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.4MEducation$335kHealth$102kHuman Services$28kPublic Benefit$27kYouth Development$3kRecreation & Sports$900Arts & Culture$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.1M
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Peter Lutheran Church$1,618,500
Trinity Lutheran Church$500,000
St Peters Lutheran School$30,000
Garuna Foundation$17,600
Valley Lutheran High School$10,000
Hillsdale College$3,750
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Mayo Clinic$2,500
Lutheran Church$2,000
The Leadership Institute$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
St Judes Children Research Hospital$2,000
Christ Care Ministries$1,500
Turning Point USA$1,000
Boys Town$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%Dakota Boys & Girls Ranch: $300 → 10%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%Boys Town: $2k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%Boys Town: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $600 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
MI
IA
NJ
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 30 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
10

Total granted

$3.4M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-17%

Still filing today

33%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $510k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GARUNA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +205%
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +40%
  • CL
    CHRIST LUTHERAN SCHOOL TUITION ORG
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHURCH IN KOREA
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHEIVEMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • RM
    RAUCHHOLZ MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
4
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
5
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Peter Lutheran Church: $2,554,119 · OtherSt Peter Lutheran ChurchTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $500,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHST PETERS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $170,000 · Other+31 more: $493,638 · Other+31 moreTHE GARUNA FOUNDATION: $143,800 · Food & NutritionHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20,250 · EducationCHRIST LUTHERAN SCHOOL TUITION ORG: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationLeadership Institute: $11,500 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,500 · Public BenefitMAYO CLINIC: $8,500 · HealthFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $4,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $300 · HealthFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $12,450 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $900 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,717,757Food & Nutrition$143,800Education$32,750Public Benefit$25,000Health$16,800Human Services$12,750Recreation & Sports$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GARUNA FOUNDATION: $143,800 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $12,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST LUTHERAN SCHOOL TUITION ORG: $10,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $4,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATRICK HENRY COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GARUNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST LUTHERAN SCHOOL TUITION ORG ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI13.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold C and Janet A Baldauf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold C and Janet A Baldauf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold C and Janet A Baldauf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph