Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold & Ruth Garber Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$15kArts & Culture$13kEducation$5kAnimals$4kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$4kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC$1,000
WEST BLOOMFIELD LITERARY GARDEN$1,000
TAMARACK CAMPS$1,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$1,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN$1,000
ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$1,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
COMMUNITY LAW CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$1,000
PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY$1,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$1,000
MAX MCCOLL BRAIN INJURY$500
GARRETS SPACE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1k → 8%COMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $1k → 10%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 9%CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JEWISH HOSPICE: $1k → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 9%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1k → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 9%JEWISH HOSPICE: $1k → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 9%JEWISH HOSPICE: $1k → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 9%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1k → 8%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $1k → 21%JEWISH HOSPICE: $1k → 8%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $1k → 21%JEWISH HOSPICE: $1k → 8%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $1k → 21%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1k → 8%DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1k → 21%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1k → 8%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ART: $1k → 21%JEWISH HOSPICE: $1k → 8%PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $1k → 21%TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 8%PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $1k → 21%GARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC: $1k → 8%PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $1k → 21%GARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC: $1k → 8%PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $1k → 21%GARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC: $1k → 8%PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $1k → 21%GARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC: $1k → 8%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%GARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC: $1k → 8%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $1k → 8%TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 8%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $1k → 8%TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 8%ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $1k → 8%TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 8%ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $1k → 8%TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 8%HEBREW FREE LOAN: $1k → 8%HEBREW FREE LOAN: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 17 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$68k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

41%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +140%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • WB
    WEST BLOOMFIELD HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • OO
    OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
3
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
4
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
5
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
6
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
9
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
10
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
11
The Detroit Creativity Project

The detroit creativity project ("dcp") seeks to empower and inspire detroit's young people through improvisation, an art form that helps people build confidence and develop a creative and collaborative approach to their lives.

Unclassified
12
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; the most unlike its peers is Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERTRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,000 · OtherTRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUEGARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINIC: $5,000 · OtherGARY BURNSTEIN COMM HEALTH CLINICRochester Community Schools: $4,000 · OtherRochester Community SchoolsWEST BLOOMFIELD LITERARY GARDEN: $4,000 · OtherWEST BLOOMFIELD LITERARY GARDENCOMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $3,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY LAW CENTERISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUE: $2,500 · OtherISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUE+7 more: $5,000 · Other+7 morePROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $5,000 · HealthPROJECT HEALTH…GARRETT'S SPACE: $2,500 · HealthGARRETT'S SPAC…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLI…THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT I…Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $3,500 · Arts & CultureBirmingham Bl…DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPH…HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$44,500Health$9,500Arts & Culture$8,500Philanthropy$5,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBirmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGARRETT'S SPACE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc ↗
  • Who funds GARRETT'S SPACE ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold & Ruth Garber Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold & Ruth Garber Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harold & Ruth Garber Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harold & Ruth Garber Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold & Ruth Garber Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph