Skip to content
Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$461
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
9
States reached
$50
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Ucla Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $0k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
’20
30
’21
10
’22
1
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$4kEducation$3kArts & Culture$1kCivil Rights$400Environment$271International$248Human Services$173Public Safety & Disaster$120Other$0
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25
Median grant
9
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION$50
OBAMA FOUNDATION$50
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$50
Individual grant recipient$40
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$40
EARTH JUSTICE$30
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND$25
Individual grant recipient$25
MARCH OF DIMES$25
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC$25
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES$25
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$20
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$20
EASTERSEALS$20
AARP FOUNDATION$16
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $243) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOY'S TOWN: $22 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $55 → 11%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25 → 16%CHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $100 → 10%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $21 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7k · 26 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
23

Total granted

$7k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+31%

Still filing today

65%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +29%
  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +15%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100 · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $950 · revenue +89%
  • TS
    THE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue -24%
  • UH
    UCLA HEALTH SYSTEM AUXILIARYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $150 · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
28/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION: $200 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE (ADL): $200 · OtherUCLA HEALTH SYSTEM AUXILIARY: $150 · Other+26 more: $1,387 · Other+26 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONTHE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $250 · EducationTHE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUND…+1 more: $60 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,050 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELESARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,020 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC+6 more: $240 · Health+6 moreMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $950 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASS…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIES…SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $65 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL C…THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $50 · Arts & CultureCHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $100 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $76 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $31 · Human ServicesECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $22 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20 · Human ServicesEARTHJUSTICE: $60 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $40 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $36 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $20 · EnvironmentGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$3,937Education$3,310Health$3,310Arts & Culture$1,165Human Services$274Environment$206Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,020 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA HEALTH SYSTEM AUXILIARY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $80 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $76 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $65 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $65 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $40 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $36 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $31 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $22 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The National Federation of the Blind: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harold a & Lois Haytin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold a & Lois Haytin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home