Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harlib Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$27kReligion$21kFood & Nutrition$20kHousing & Shelter$18kEducation$16kEnvironment$15kHealth$11kScience & Tech$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$301k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOPANGA FARMERS MARKET$10,000
BABY 2 BABY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,222
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $550 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 7 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$58k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+128%

Still filing today

57%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    Inspiration Corporation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $18k · revenue +102%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • VD
    VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TT
    TRIBAL TRUST FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +236%
  • TM
    THE MILKY WAY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • NR
    NO RES GOURMETgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +395%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Variety - the Childrens Charity International

We empower children who are sick, disadvantaged, or living with disabilities through life-changing programs that provide medical care, mobility, education, and support to live without limits.

International
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
Direct Relief

Direct relief is a humanitarian aid organization, active in all 50 states and more than 80 countries, with a mission to improve the health and lives of people affected by poverty or emergencies - without regard to politics, religion, or…

International
7
Bikur Cholim

Bikur cholim organizes and subsidizes medical treatment, speech and physical therapy, medication, durable medical equipment, blood products, homecare, transportation, housing for patients and family-members, meals, and diagnostics while…

Health
8
All for Kids Organization

This year, all for kids provided 70,000 at-risk children and parents living in los angeles and orange counties with services that include school readiness, parenting classes, family resource centers, support groups, mental health…

Human Services
9
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Miracle Flights

Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Ranch Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tribal Trust Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISHKAN CHICAGO: $16,500 · OtherMISHKAN CHICAGOTHE MILKY WAY FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherTHE MILKY WAY FOUNDATIONBABY2BABY: $10,000 · OtherBABY2BABYTOPANGA FARMERS MARKET: $10,000 · OtherTOPANGA FARMERS MARKETLOVING HANDS CHILDRESN HOME: $5,555 · OtherLOVING HANDS CHILDRESN HOMECHILDRENS CORNER: $4,560 · OtherCHILDRENS CORNERIndividual grant recipient: $4,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF PACIFIC PALISADES INC: $3,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $6,124 · Other+5 moreInspiration Corporation: $17,500 · Human ServicesInspiration Corpo…VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3,500 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHI…THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDRENS RAN…CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationCORPORATION…+1 more: $500 · EducationTRIBAL TRUST FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTRIBAL TRUS…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,167 · HealthNO RES GOURMET: $10,000 · Food & NutritionVALLEY CATS INC: $2,500 · Animals
Other$74,039Human Services$23,000Education$15,500Arts & Culture$15,000Health$11,167Food & Nutrition$10,000Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInspiration Corporation: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRIBAL TRUST FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetBABY2BABY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO RES GOURMET: $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CATS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE HAPPINESS CLUB: $2,222 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,167 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $480 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRIBAL TRUST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds NO RES GOURMET ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAPPINESS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harlib Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harlib Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harlib Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harlib Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harlib’s filings →

    More from the funding graph