Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harborglow Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$229k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of Harborglow Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Harborglow Inc named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $229k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
13
18
9
19
3
20
0
21
4
22
8
23
9
24
5
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.7MEducation$322kHuman Services$309kHealth$135kInternational$57kReligion$30kYouth Development$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$100,000
NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE$26,050
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$25,000
PSIA - RM$10,000
JEWISH COLORADO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CU BOULDER HILLEL$5,000
KENYA EDUCATION FUND$5,000
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$5,000
SPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
EAST HAMPTON TOWN POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $365k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $150 → 13%NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE: $180k → 6%NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE: $31k → 6%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $21k → 17%NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE: $30k → 6%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $20k → 17%NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE: $26k → 6%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 17%NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE: $24k → 6%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 17%NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE: $17k → 6%NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 9 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
25

Total granted

$1.3M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+17%

Still filing today

89%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $452k · revenue +39%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +79%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $309k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AA
    ANDREA AND MIKE LEEDS DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TL
    TRACY LEEDS GIVING FUND CO FIDELITY CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CL
    CARYN LEEDS GIVING FUND CO FIDELITY CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Schott Foundation for Public Education and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Volunteer Fire & Emergency …Medical Research FoundationsUnion Member Benefit FundsInternational Development A…Colorado Advocacy and Polic…Jewish Israel Support Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr11%33%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%8%20–35yr11%65%35–55yr13%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
13%
12,427/92,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,071,845 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $451,860 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL…+2 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $309,171 · Human ServicesNORTH SHORE CHIL…KENYA EDUCATION FUND — $56,000 · Human ServicesKENYA EDUCATION …+1 more — $150 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $320,030 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …+2 more — $2,100 · EducationANDREA AND MIKE LEEDS DONOR ADVISED FUND — $50,000 · OtherTRACY LEEDS GIVING FUND CO FIDELITY CHARITABLE — $25,000 · OtherCARYN LEEDS GIVING FUND CO FIDELITY CHARITABLE — $25,000 · OtherLAUREN LEEDS GIVING FUND CO FIDELITY CHARITABLE — $25,000 · OtherPSIA - RM — $10,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherSundance Institute — $10,000 · Other+17 more — $32,941 · OtherNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100,591 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $10,775 · Health+4 more — $1,800 · HealthColorado Youth Congress — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Community Improvement$1,081,845Philanthropy$471,860Human Services$365,321Education$322,130Other$197,941Health$113,166Civil Rights$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,071,845 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $451,860 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $320,030 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $309,171 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100,591 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENYA EDUCATION FUND — $56,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetJEWISHColorado — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $10,775 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCU BOULDER HILLEL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $4,750 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetEAST HAMPTON TOWN PBA — $4,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI ENERGYCARE INC — $1,815 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFeeding America — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF LIFE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTER CANYON PARENT SUPPORT GROUP — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harborglow Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph