Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc

Hannah and friends is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing a better quality of life for children and adults with sepcial needs.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$136kHuman Services$126kRecreation & Sports$120kPhilanthropy$36kArts & Culture$12kReligion$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOGAN COMMUNITY RESOURCES$50,000
VINCEREMOS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$14,150
ALDOPLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$6,000
PLACE TO BE ME$5,100
CAMP MILLHOUSE INC$4,541
O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION DBA A ROSIE PLACE$3,000
INSOURCE$1,180
ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH BEND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISERICORIDA HEART OF MERCY: $10k → 14%ALDOPLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 11%ALDOPLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 42%.

Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$356k · 8 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$356k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Logan Community Resources Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $191k · revenue +35%
  • DS
    Dwight Stephenson Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $82k · revenue +411% · 93% of their budget
  • VR
    Vinceremos Riding Center Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • 3A
    3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH
    one grant, 2019 · $62k · revenue -20%
  • MISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +286%
  • LM
    Luvability Ministries
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
2
Build Rehabilitation Industries Inc

Build rehabilitation industries, inc. dba buildability ("build"), provides services and support for people with developmental and intellectual disabilities, assisting them to achieve greater independence and inclusion in their communities.

Employment
3
Disability Resource in Home Services Inc

To provide services to clients and families with compassion, dignity, and respect. To maintain our clients quality of life, empower them in every way possible, and to build a strong foundation of support during their time of need.

Health
4
Special Equestrians Inc

Our Vision: A community where the impossible becomes possible. Our mission: To enrich the lives of people with physical, cognitive or emotional challenges through a relationship with a horse.

Human Services
5
Arc of Vigo County Inc

The Arc of Vigo County is committed to providing advocacy, parent support and training, respite services for families who have a family member at home with a developmental disability, a supported employment service for persons with…

Human Services
6
The Arc of Northwest Indiana Inc

Mission is to provide necessary resources to persons with disabilities in order to assist them in enhancing their daily lives. we provide pre-vocational training, habilitation services, individual support, and employment services based on…

Human Services
7
Disability Rights and Resource Center Inc

To advocate for disabled individuals and to plan and develop programs and services to aid individuals with disabilities in reaching maximum personal independence.

Health
8
Riverview Industries Inc

To provide a meaningful work experience and quality of life for the benefit of adults with developmental disabilities

Employment
9
Camp Sunshine

To offer experiences that model and nurture a culture of inclusion, grace and joy, through which people with and without disabilities can transcend barriers and value both their own gifts and the talents of others.

Human Services
10
Morning Dove Therapeutic Riding Inc

Morning Dove Therapeutic Riding Center is a Path International Premier Accredited Center that provides equine-assisted therapy services for those with physical, mental and emotional disabilities. Morning Dove's programs provide weekly…

Education
11
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
12
Mane Gait

Mane Gait provides therapeutic horseback riding to children and adults with a wide range of developmental difficulties, enabling them to gain strength, confidence, and a sense of belonging.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vinceremos Riding Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is 3RD and Goal Foundation Attn Brian Veith. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Logan Community Resources Inc: $190,800 · OtherLogan Community Resources IncPLACE TO BE ME: $12,100 · OtherPLACE TO BE ME+4 more: $5,000 · OtherDwight Stephenson Foundation Inc: $81,680 · PhilanthropyDwight Stephenson Fou…3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH: $61,775 · Housing & Shelter3RD AND GOAL FOU…Vinceremos Riding Center Inc: $42,150 · HealthVinceremos R…O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · HealthO'HANA HERIT…ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAMP MILLHOUSE INC: $8,541 · Recreation & SportsINDIANA RESOURCE CENTER FOR FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $3,680 · EducationLuvability Ministries: $2,000 · Religion
Other$207,900Philanthropy$81,680Housing & Shelter$61,775Health$49,150Human Services$20,000Recreation & Sports$8,541Education$3,680Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $190,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDwight Stephenson Foundation Inc: $81,680 over 2y, 93% of budget3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH: $61,775 over 1y, 17% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $42,150 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP MILLHOUSE INC: $8,541 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA RESOURCE CENTER FOR FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $3,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLuvability Ministries: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH BEND: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Radiology Inc FoundationIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Radiology Inc Foundation · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hannah & Friends Weis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph