Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc

Hannah and friends is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing a better quality of life for children and adults with sepcial needs.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of HANNAH & FRIENDS WEIS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOGAN COMMUNITY RESOURCES$50,000
VINCEREMOS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$14,150
ALDOPLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$6,000
PLACE TO BE ME$5,100
CAMP MILLHOUSE INC$4,541
O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION DBA A ROSIE PLACE$3,000
INSOURCE$1,180
ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH BEND$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISERICORIDA HEART OF MERCY: $10k → 14%ALDOPLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 11%ALDOPLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$356k · 8 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$356k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Logan Community Resources Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $191k · revenue +35%
  • DS
    Dwight Stephenson Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $82k · revenue +411% · 93% of their budget
  • VR
    Vinceremos Riding Center Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • 3A
    3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH
    one grant, 2019 · $62k · revenue -20%
  • MISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +286%
  • LM
    Luvability Ministries
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
2
Build Rehabilitation Industries Inc

Build rehabilitation industries, inc. dba buildability ("build"), provides services and support for people with developmental and intellectual disabilities, assisting them to achieve greater independence and inclusion in their communities.

Employment
3
Disability Resource in Home Services Inc

To provide services to clients and families with compassion, dignity, and respect. To maintain our clients quality of life, empower them in every way possible, and to build a strong foundation of support during their time of need.

Health
4
Special Equestrians Inc

Our Vision: A community where the impossible becomes possible. Our mission: To enrich the lives of people with physical, cognitive or emotional challenges through a relationship with a horse.

Human Services
5
Arc of Vigo County Inc

The Arc of Vigo County is committed to providing advocacy, parent support and training, respite services for families who have a family member at home with a developmental disability, a supported employment service for persons with…

Human Services
6
The Arc of Northwest Indiana Inc

Mission is to provide necessary resources to persons with disabilities in order to assist them in enhancing their daily lives. we provide pre-vocational training, habilitation services, individual support, and employment services based on…

Human Services
7
Disability Rights and Resource Center Inc

To advocate for disabled individuals and to plan and develop programs and services to aid individuals with disabilities in reaching maximum personal independence.

Health
8
Riverview Industries Inc

To provide a meaningful work experience and quality of life for the benefit of adults with developmental disabilities

Employment
9
Camp Sunshine

To offer experiences that model and nurture a culture of inclusion, grace and joy, through which people with and without disabilities can transcend barriers and value both their own gifts and the talents of others.

Human Services
10
Morning Dove Therapeutic Riding Inc

Morning Dove Therapeutic Riding Center is a Path International Premier Accredited Center that provides equine-assisted therapy services for those with physical, mental and emotional disabilities. Morning Dove's programs provide weekly…

Education
11
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
12
Mane Gait

Mane Gait provides therapeutic horseback riding to children and adults with a wide range of developmental difficulties, enabling them to gain strength, confidence, and a sense of belonging.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vinceremos Riding Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is 3RD and Goal Foundation Attn Brian Veith. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Logan Community Resources Inc — $190,800 · OtherLogan Community Resources IncPLACE TO BE ME — $12,100 · OtherPLACE TO BE ME+4 more — $5,000 · OtherDwight Stephenson Foundation Inc — $81,680 · PhilanthropyDwight Stephenson Fou…3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH — $61,775 · Housing & Shelter3RD AND GOAL FOU…Vinceremos Riding Center Inc — $42,150 · HealthVinceremos R…O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · HealthO'HANA HERIT…ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesCAMP MILLHOUSE INC — $8,541 · Recreation & SportsINDIANA RESOURCE CENTER FOR FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC — $3,680 · EducationLuvability Ministries — $2,000 · Religion
Other$207,900Philanthropy$81,680Housing & Shelter$61,775Health$49,150Human Services$20,000Recreation & Sports$8,541Education$3,680Religion$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLogan Community Resources Inc — $190,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDwight Stephenson Foundation Inc — $81,680 over 2y, 93% of budget3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH — $61,775 over 1y, 17% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc — $42,150 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP MILLHOUSE INC — $8,541 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA RESOURCE CENTER FOR FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC — $3,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLuvability Ministries — $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH BEND — $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Radiology Inc FoundationIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Radiology Inc Foundation · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hannah & Friends Weis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph