Skip to content

· Public charity

Hands on Tzedakah Inc

To reach out to individuals in need by supporting programs that fall below the radar screen of traditional funding.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$538kYouth Development$238kFood & Nutrition$236kInternational$203kPhilanthropy$175kReligion$120kRecreation & Sports$106kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $259,281, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,985,005 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,725,724 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$30,777
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$96,115
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH$40,689
MATANYA'S HOPE$37,215
SWEET DREAM MAKERS INC$30,777
THE VOLEN CENTER$19,500
MILAGRO CENTER$14,985
JUST IMAGINE$10,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $551k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARIDAD CENTER: $25k → 11%JARC: $17k → 8%NJ PEDIATRIC PATIENTS CHARITABLE TRUST: $48k → 12%CARIDAD CENTER: $18k → 11%NEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS: $20k → 12%CARIDAD CENTER: $18k → 11%NEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS: $10k → 12%CARIDAD CENTER: $17k → 11%NEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS: $10k → 12%CARIDAD CENTER: $12k → 11%NEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS CHARITABLE TRUST FUND: $8k → 12%CARIDAD CENTER: $10k → 11%NJ PEDIATRIC PATIENTS CHARITABLE TRUST: $7k → 12%PROJECT EZRA: $14k → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $12k → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $12k → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $12k → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $6k → 17%CAMP KAVOD: $15k → 11%CAMP KAVOD: $15k → 11%CAMP KAVOD: $12k → 11%CAMP KAVOD: $12k → 11%CAMP KAVOD: $10k → 11%CAMP KAVOD: $8k → 11%CAMP KAVOD: $8k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $41k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $33k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $28k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $28k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $23k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $17k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $9k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $8k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
NJ
KY
DC
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.7M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$1.7M · 100% · 25 grants

Stated purpose: MEALS-POOR · SUPPLIES/ASSISTANCE · FOOD/AID/SUPPLIES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 20 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$2.8M
$197k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+48%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RN
    RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $936k · revenue +59%
  • MF
    MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $219k · revenue +51%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $194k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • BT
    BNAI TORAH CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2017 · $103k
  • SG
    ST GREGORYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $27k
  • J
    JARC
    one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
2
Jewish Family Services of Greater Orlando Inc

Jewish family services of greater orlando (jfs orlando) provides services to stabilize individuals and families in crisis and enhances the quality of life across generations to all members of the central florida community. annually, our…

Human Services
3
Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc

The mission of the greater miami jewish federation is to mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity, values and shared purpose of the jewish people in miami, in israel and…

Philanthropy
4
Kesher Ld Inc Kesher

To provide, and guide other schools in providing, an education in both jewish and secular studies that meet the needs of the invididual student, and which empowers each student to reach his/her highest level of independent and…

Education
5
Masada Home Care Inc

Mission: masada home care, inc. provides home health care services to elderly and disabled persons residing in miami-dade county. our goal is to assist our clients in becoming as independent as possible while enjoying the many benefits…

Health
6
Jewish Family Home Care Inc

Jewish family home care, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals, strengthening older adults and families, and protecting the vulnerable by providing exceptional home care and nursing assessments services guided by jewish values,…

Health
7
The Ferd and Gladys Alpert Jewish Family & Children Service of Palm Beach C Ounty Inc

The mission of ferd & gladys alpert jewish family & children's service of palm beach county, inc. is to serve the community by: - providing a range of needed social services to strengthen individuals and families. - participating in…

Human Services
8
Marcus Jewish Community Center of Atlanta Inc

To foster and ensure a vibrant greater Atlanta Jewish community by providing programs and services of distinction that attract, involve, and inspire meaningful connections and promote Jewish values.

Human Services
9
Jewish Family & Childrens Services of Greater Mercer County Inc

JFCS strengthens individuals and families by empowering people to care for themselves and others. This is accomplished through a wide range of high quality social services and programs designed to assist families with many of life's…

Human Services
10
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
11
Samuel M and Helene Soref Jewish Community Center Inc

The soref jcc is a nonprofit organization which contributes to the welfare of the entire community by providing a center for cultural, educational, recreational, and social services, while continuing to preserve jewish tradition and values.

—
12
Jack & Lee Rosen Jewish Community Center Inc

To be a welcoming and inclusive community hub, rooted in jewish values, where individuals and families from all faiths and backgrounds come together to learn, grow, and connect through meaningful activities that foster education,…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is East Naples Middle School Pto Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $935,528 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY …AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC: $194,119 · Human ServicesAMERICAN ASSOCIATION…NEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS CHARITABLE TRUST FUND INC: $103,651 · Human ServicesNEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC…Caridad Center Inc: $99,761 · Human ServicesCaridad Center IncADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $78,968 · Human ServicesADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS …Project Ezra: $57,080 · Human ServicesProject Ezra+1 more: $17,335 · Human ServicesMAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC: $139,566 · OtherMAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INCBNAI TORAH CONGREGATION: $103,059 · OtherBNAI TORAH CONGREGATIONROSE ART FOUNDATION INC: $48,872 · OtherROSE ART FOUNDATION INCMARTIN COUNTY SPECIAL NEEDS TRAINING INC: $42,520 · OtherMARTIN COUNTY SPECIAL NEEDS T…ST GREGORYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH INC: $27,308 · OtherMATANYA'S HOPE: $125,215 · OtherMATANYA'S HOPEBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $116,393 · OtherBOCA HELPING HANDS INCCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $92,033 · OtherCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE …+8 more: $91,335 · Other+8 moreJUST IMAGINE: $143,500 · Youth DevelopmentFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $94,444 · Youth DevelopmentMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $219,244 · Arts & CultureSweet Dream Makers Inc: $175,167 · PhilanthropyThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $76,438 · InternationalMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $59,283 · International
Health$935,528Human Services$550,914Other$786,301Youth Development$237,944Arts & Culture$219,244Philanthropy$175,167International$135,721

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $935,528 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $219,244 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC: $194,119 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetSweet Dream Makers Inc: $175,167 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetJUST IMAGINE: $143,500 over 9y, 35% of budgetMAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC: $139,566 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMATANYA'S HOPE: $125,215 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $116,393 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS CHARITABLE TRUST FUND INC: $103,651 over 6y, 33% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $99,761 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $94,444 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $92,033 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $78,968 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $76,438 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $59,283 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetProject Ezra: $57,080 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetROSE ART FOUNDATION INC: $48,872 over 4y, 60% of budgetJARC: $17,335 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $16,950 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWorld of Change: $15,531 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetFRESH AIR SOCIETY: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Sweet Dream Makers Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUST IMAGINE ↗
  • Who funds MAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MATANYA'S HOPE ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY PEDIATRIC PATIENTS CHARITABLE TRUST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds MERCADO GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Ezra ↗
  • Who funds ROSE ART FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds World of Change ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER TEL HASHOMER INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boca West Children's Foundation Fka Boca West Community Charitable FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boca West Children's Foundation Fka Boca West Community Charitable Foundation · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hands on Tzedakah Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hands on Tzedakah Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Mae Volen Senior Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hands on Tzedakah Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hands on Tzedakah Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hands on Tzedakah’s filings →

More from the funding graph