How much did HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC grant in FY2025?

HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC reported 8 grants totaling $1,985,005 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC based?

HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC is based in FL.

HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC

Support of safety-net or essential, life sustaining programs such as combatting hunger & poverty, supporting programs for youth at risk & the elderly, helping those with special needs or in need of compassionate care & helping victims of war, terror & natural disasters.

$2.0M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$96k

Largest

01What you fund

0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$729kHuman Services$456kYouth Development$195kArts & Culture$153kPhilanthropy$150kInternational$136kEducation$115kRecreation & Sports$96kFood & Nutrition$54kOther$268k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

financial aidequip repairsisraeltranspequipmentjewish

2020

valuedonatedvalued pricechange collectedsignificantvolunteersdental

2021

valuedonatedvalued pricesignificantvolunteersdentaldetermined

2022

camping experiencesequip suppliesukraine relieffurnituresleepingsweet dreamdream makers

2023

sleepingsweet dreamdream makersphysicalbedsequipmentpsychological

2025

studentmilagroartsacademiccenter'sensurecultural

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k7 grants · $163k
$50k–250k1 grant · $96k

$30,777

Median grant

States reached

$2.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$96,115
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH$40,689
MATANYA'S HOPE$37,215
SWEET DREAM MAKERS INC$30,777
THE VOLEN CENTER$19,500
MILAGRO CENTER$14,985
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$10,000
JUST IMAGINE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $456k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 19 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

-15%

Still filing today

89%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsInternationalHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RN
RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
7× · 2018–2025 · $729k · revenue +141%
AA
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH
7× · 2018–2025 · $157k · revenue +102%
MC
MILAGRO CENTER
6× · 2018–2025 · $153k · revenue +31%

Funded once

SG
ST GREGORY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
2× · 2020–2025 · $27k
MC
MARTIN COUNTY SPECIAL NEEDS TRAINING INC
one grant, 2018 · $24k
J
JARC
one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County

To strengthen jewish identity, energize the relationship with israel and meeting human needs that are uniquely the obligation of the jewish community.

Philanthropy

Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc

JFCS, guided by Jewish values, works with youth and other vulnerable community members of all faiths to build resilience and to achieve the social and economic stability needed to support their mental health and well-being.

Human Services

Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc

To mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity values and shared purpose (see schedule o for continuation)

Philanthropy

Joseph & Florence Mandel Jewish Day School

Joseph & Florence Mandel Jewish Day School develops ethical leadership, confident critical thinking, and a lifelong love of learning. By integrating superior general academics and Judaic studies, "Mandel JDS" achieves excellence in a…

Education

The Jewish Pavilion of Central Florida

The jewish connection for elder-care residents. enhancing lives in senior-living communities through friendly visits, holiday celebrations and engaging programs. bringing smiles to residents of all faiths.

Human Services

Hillel At Florida International University

Enrich the lives of jewish students

—

Jewish Family & Childrens Service of

To do everything possible to create health and happiness in our community by providing the best social services, delivered by exceptional people.

Human Services

Jewish Board of Family & Children's

For 150 years, the jewish board of family and children's services, inc. ("the jewish board") has been helping new yorkers realize their potential and live as independently as possible. we promote resilience and recovery by addressing all…

Human Services

Jewish Kids Group Foundation Inc

Jewish kids groups is an independent network of jewish supplementary schools that educate and inspire children-in a way that feels like summer camp-engendering positive jewish learning, identity, and friendships.

Education

Masada Home Care Inc

To provide home care assistance and personalized life sustaining services to elderly and disabled clients residing in miami, dade county (see sch o).

Health

Jewish Family Service of Greater

To enhance and strengthen the quality of life through the Jewish values of caring and compassion.

—

Natan and Lidia Peisach Family

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boca Helping Hands Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ruth & Norman Rales Jewish Family. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/34

the rest of the field

11%

6,201/57,895

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/25

Grantees still filing

18/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$728,974Human Services$456,073Other$532,924Youth Development$194,944Arts & Culture$153,335Philanthropy$150,167International$135,721

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boca Raton Regional Hospital IncFL16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Boca Rio Foundation Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROSE ART FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~15 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 208907518 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROSE ART FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 15 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hands on Tzedakah Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hands on Tzedakah Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hands on Tzedakah Inc?

More from the funding graph

HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hands on Tzedakah Inc?

More from the funding graph