Skip to content

· Public charity

Hands Across the Valley Inc George Altamura Sr

Hands accross the valley, guided by its board of directors, is committed to working toward the goal of a community without hunger.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$708k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $159,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,625 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,125 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $137k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$579k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY - NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK$37,500
SENIOR NUTRITION SERVICES (MEALS ON WHEELS)$37,500
COPE FAMILY CENTER$15,000
PUERTAS ABIERTAS$14,000
MOLLY'S ANGELS$12,500
HOLIDAY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$10,000
NAPA SALVATION ARMY$10,000
NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE$9,000
NAPA FARMERS MARKET$8,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $321k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY - NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK: $88k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY - NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK: $80k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY - NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK: $70k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY - NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK: $38k → 9%HOLIDAY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 9%HOLIDAY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $8k → 9%MOLLY'S ANGELS: $13k → 9%MOLLY'S ANGELS: $8k → 9%MOLLY'S ANGELS: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$606k · 4 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$606k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+31%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $293k · revenue +104%
  • MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $266k · revenue -24%
  • MA
    MOLLYS ANGELS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • FI
    FEEDING IT FORWARD INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $42k · revenue +7%
  • NV
    NAPA VALLEY CANDOgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
2
Napa State Hospital Volunteer Community Advisory Board

Offers patients activities and special events.

Unclassified
3
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
4
Napa County Seed Library
Environment
5
Nac Food Pantry Inc

Providing weekly food assistance

Food & Nutrition
6
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—
7
Handson Central California

Inspire, equip and mobilize people to take action to change their communities and the world. volunteer focus areas are: education, environment, emergency preparedness and response and poverty alleviation. serves all ages and populations.

—
8
On the Move

Building and maintaining effective leaders and highly functioning organizations in the public sector.

Human Services
9
South Palo Alto Food Closet

Provide food to qualifying families in Palo Alto

Food & Nutrition
10
Yolo Food Bank

The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…

Food & Nutrition
11
Meals On Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Inc

To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.

Food & Nutrition
12
Catholic Charities of Yolo-Solano

Our mission is to reach out and provide assistance to anyone in need in our community, especially the poor and disadvantaged. we offer health and social service programs that contribute to the individual's freedom and independence, while…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cope Family Center; the most unlike its peers is Mollys Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $293,250 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEYMOLLYS ANGELS: $27,500 · Human ServicesMOLLYS ANGELSMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $265,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INCFEEDING IT FORWARD INC: $41,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING IT FORWARD INC+1 more: $8,000 · Food & NutritionNAPA SALVATION ARMY: $20,000 · OtherNAPA VALLEY COLLEGE: $9,000 · OtherNAPA FARMERS MARKET: $8,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST APOLLINARIS CONFERENCE: $6,000 · OtherCope Family Center: $15,000 · Crime & LegalPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $14,000 · Health
Human Services$320,750Food & Nutrition$315,000Other$43,000Crime & Legal$15,000Health$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $293,250 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $265,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDING IT FORWARD INC: $41,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMOLLYS ANGELS: $27,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCope Family Center: $15,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $14,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CANDO: $8,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING IT FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds MOLLYS ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds Cope Family Center ↗
  • Who funds Puertas Abiertas Community Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY CANDO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter a & Vernice H Gasser FoundationCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Vollmer Family Foundation · Lillian Rogatz Memorial Foundation · Winiarski Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hands Across the Valley Inc George Altamura Sr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hands Across the Valley Inc George Altamura Sr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Meals On Wheels People Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hands Across the Valley Inc George Altamura Sr’s filings →

More from the funding graph