Skip to content

· Private foundation

Handel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$40kHuman Services$17kEducation$16kReligion$2kArts & Culture$800
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,998
Median grant
1
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTER SEALS$5,500
AKRONS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$4,998
EJ DEBARTOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$3,500
CARMSTRONG$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 19%GOLDEN STRING INC: $5k → 19%GOLDEN STRING INC: $2k → 19%GOLDEN STRINGS: $2k → 19%GOLDEN STRINGS: $2k → 19%GOLDEN STRINGS: $1k → 19%GOLDEN STRING INC: $1k → 19%GOLDEN STRING INC: $470 → 19%POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: $8k → 19%POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: $372 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

$73k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+5%

Still filing today

36%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOLDEN STRING INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +132%
  • TE
    THE EDWARD J DEBARTOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +40%
  • PD
    POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • AL
    ACLD LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Down Syndrome Association of Maryland

We empower individuals with down syndrome and their communities through education, resources, outreach and advocacy. we are committed to amplifying our collective voices and broader needs to drive meaningful change.

Human Services
2
The Vincent Smith School

The Vincent Smith School is a co-ed, independent, special education school for grades ones through twelve, serving Nassau, Suffolk, and New York City students. The School specializes in students with various learning issues.

Education
3
Asxl Rare Research Endowment Foundation

Support research and education that lead to improved quality of life for individuals with ASXL syndromes.

Health
4
Gorlin Syndrome Alliance

To thoughtfully support, comprehensively educate, and aggressively seek the best treatments and a cure for those affected by gorlin syndrome.

Health
5
Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome Foundation

Fund research to better understand Smith-Kingsmore syndrome and find treatments to improve patient quality of life and, ultimately, a cure.

Health
6
Smh Administrative Services

Smh administrative services, inc. ("sma") is a not-for-profit corporation providing administrative support to affiliated not-for-profit organizations serving children requiring medical and rehabilitative services. st. mary's healthcare…

Health
7
The Arc of Quinebaug Valley Inc

Founded in 1952, The Arc Quinebaug Valley is a nonprofit human services agency committed to supporting individuals (and their families) with intellectual, developmental and other life-affecting disabilities. We provide opportunities…

—
8
St Marys Foundation for Children Inc

St. Marys Foundation for Children, Inc. is dedicated to the enhancement of health, safety and quality of life for children with special needs.

—
9
Vincent S Mastro Montessori Academy

Education as per montessori philosophy

Education
10
Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome Alliance Inc

Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome Alliance (SDS Alliance) is a US-based nonprofit organization serving the global SDS community to improve and save the lives of people affected by SDS by focusing on research and therapy development.

Health
11
Down Syndrome Association of Central California

To enhance the quality of life for all people whose lives are touched by Down Syndrome

Health
12
World Sleep Society Inc

Advance sleep medicine worldwide by convening the world of sleep science and medicine.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Potential Development Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Edward J Debartolo Memorial Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AKRONS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15,358 · OtherAKRONS CHILDREN'S HOSPITALAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10,000 · OtherAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALEASTER SEALS: $8,303 · OtherEASTER SEALSUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $3,392 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCEIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,200 · OtherACLD LEARNING CENTER: $1,913 · Other+12 more: $11,295 · Other+12 moreGOLDEN STRING INC: $14,058 · Human ServicesGOLDEN STRING INCPOTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC: $8,441 · Human ServicesPOTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM …Yampa Valley Autism Program: $1,200 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesTHE EDWARD J DEBARTOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EducationTHE EDWARD …WILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $650 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 · HealthST MARON'S EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $650 · Philanthropy
Other$54,961Human Services$24,199Education$9,000Health$1,150Philanthropy$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOLDEN STRING INC: $14,058 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE EDWARD J DEBARTOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPOTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC: $8,441 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program: $1,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCloves Syndrome Community: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARON'S EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHospice of the Valley Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOLDEN STRING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EDWARD J DEBARTOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Yampa Valley Autism Program ↗
  • Who funds Cloves Syndrome Community ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARON'S EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Premier Bank FoundationOH13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Premier Bank Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Handel Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Handel Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Handel Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Handel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Handel’s filings →

More from the funding graph