Skip to content
Han and Jiang Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Han and Jiang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$671kScience & Tech$700Arts & Culture$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $600
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of California Berkeley F$100,000
The Nueva School$85,000
University of Washington Foundation$20,000
Crystal Springs Uplands School$10,000
PENINSULA BALLET THEATRE$500
Wikimedia Foundation$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 29% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Nueva School: $100k → 7%University of California Berkeley F: $100k → 10%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $200 → 19%University of Washington Foundation: $40k → 9%The Nueva School: $100k → 7%University of California Berkeley F: $30k → 10%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $200 → 19%University of Washington Foundation: $20k → 9%The Nueva School: $95k → 7%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $200 → 19%University of Washington Foundation: $2k → 9%The Nueva School: $85k → 7%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $100 → 19%The Nueva School: $50k → 7%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $13k → 7%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $10k → 7%Hillsborough Schools Foundation: $10k → 7%Hillsborough Schools Foundation: $5k → 7%Burlingame Intermediate School PTA: $1k → 7%Peking University Education Foundat: $10k → 7%PENINSULA BALLET THEATRE: $500 → 7%San Mateo Public Library Foundation: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Han and Jiang Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 87%.

Han and Jiang Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$661k · 7 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$661k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+121%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NUEVA SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $430k · revenue +32%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue +19%
  • CS
    CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $23k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • PU
    Peking University Education Foundat
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • BI
    BURLINGAME INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +397%
  • KA
    KHAN ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue +121%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
3
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
4
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
5
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
6
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
7
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
8
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
9
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
10
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
11
The Branson School

To provide an academically exceptional education to students grade 9 through 12 in a warm, supportive, and nurturing environment.

Education
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillsborough Schools Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Ballet Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NUEVA SCHOOL: $430,000 · EducationNUEVA SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $130,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $62,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $22,500 · Education+3 more: $15,500 · EducationPeking University Education Foundat: $10,000 · OtherBURLINGAME INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherTHE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC: $700 · Recreation & SportsPENINSULA BALLET THEATRE: $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$660,000Other$11,100Recreation & Sports$700Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNUEVA SCHOOL: $430,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $62,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBURLINGAME INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS: $1,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA BALLET THEATRE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Mateo Public Library Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David and Lucile …Silicon Valley Commun…The Blackbaud Giving …National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The David and Lucile Packard FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Han and Jiang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Han and Jiang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Han and Jiang Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home