Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Han and Jiang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$671kScience & Tech$700Arts & Culture$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $600
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of California Berkeley F$100,000
The Nueva School$85,000
University of Washington Foundation$20,000
Crystal Springs Uplands School$10,000
PENINSULA BALLET THEATRE$500
Wikimedia Foundation$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 29% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Nueva School: $100k → 7%University of California Berkeley F: $100k → 10%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $200 → 19%University of Washington Foundation: $40k → 9%The Nueva School: $100k → 7%University of California Berkeley F: $30k → 10%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $200 → 19%University of Washington Foundation: $20k → 9%The Nueva School: $95k → 7%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $200 → 19%University of Washington Foundation: $2k → 9%The Nueva School: $85k → 7%Wikimedia Foundation: $100 → 10%Academy Of Model Aeronautics Ama: $100 → 19%The Nueva School: $50k → 7%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $13k → 7%Hillsborough Schools Foundation: $10k → 7%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $10k → 7%Hillsborough Schools Foundation: $5k → 7%Burlingame Intermediate School PTA: $1k → 7%Peking University Education Foundat: $10k → 7%PENINSULA BALLET THEATRE: $500 → 7%San Mateo Public Library Foundation: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Han and Jiang Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Han and Jiang Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$661k · 7 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$661k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+121%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NUEVA SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $430k · revenue +32%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue +19%
  • CS
    CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $23k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • PU
    Peking University Education Foundat
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • BI
    BURLINGAME INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +397%
  • SM
    San Mateo Public Library Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
3
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
4
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
5
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
6
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
7
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
8
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

9
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

10
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
11
The Branson School

To provide an academically exceptional education to students grade 9 through 12 in a warm, supportive, and nurturing environment.

Education
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillsborough Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Ballet Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NUEVA SCHOOL — $430,000 · EducationNUEVA SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $130,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $62,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $22,500 · Education+3 more — $15,500 · EducationPeking University Education Foundat — $10,000 · OtherBURLINGAME INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS — $1,000 · Other+1 more — $100 · OtherTHE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC — $700 · Recreation & SportsPENINSULA BALLET THEATRE — $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$660,000Other$11,100Recreation & Sports$700Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNUEVA SCHOOL — $430,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $62,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBURLINGAME INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS — $1,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS INC — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA BALLET THEATRE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSan Mateo Public Library Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David and Lucile Packard FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Han and Jiang Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph