Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hamsa Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$228k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$110kHealth$95kPublic Safety & Disaster$95kHuman Services$90kInternational$60kArts & Culture$58kEducation$53kEnvironment$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $210k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$15,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA$15,000
GLOBAL HARMONY THROUGH PERSONAL EXCELLENCE INC$15,000
PORCH INC$10,000
MUSICAL EMPOWERMENT$10,000
SHINING IN DARKNESS CO FLORIDA DEVAUL-DUDLEY$10,000
MAAME INC$10,000
OCRCC$10,000
WELL DONE FOUNDATION$10,000
FINN2FINN ALLIANCE INC ATTN WELLBEINGS$10,000
HANNOLD FOUNDATION CO WORKHIVE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EL SISTEMA USA: $5k → 11%STEPUP DURHAM: $15k → 11%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
MI
NY
OR
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 15 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$582k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-26%

Still filing today

60%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +46%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +40%
  • GH
    GLOBAL HARMONY THROUGH PERSONAL EXCELLENCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • STEPUP DURHAM
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -26%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
4
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
5
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
8
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
11
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
12
Foodcircle Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Well Done Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PORCH INC: $60,000 · OtherPORCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAROLINA PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 · OtherCAROLINA PERFORMING ARTSAMERICAN RED CROSS: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSPARELLI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherPARELLI FOUNDATION INCPROJECT BLOOM: $20,000 · OtherPROJECT BLOOMFEEDING AMERICA: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $88,000 · Other+10 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $60,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL K…Mercy Corps: $30,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 · InternationalInternational R…FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $85,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …PROJECT BIOME INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BIOME…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $75,000 · HealthPLANNED PARE…PARVATI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthPARVATI FOUN…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesSTEPUP DURHAM: $15,000 · Human ServicesEL SISTEMA USA: $5,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL HARMONY THROUGH PERSONAL EXCELLENCE: $40,000 · EducationBOOK HARVEST: $12,500 · EducationCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $15,000 · EnvironmentWell Done Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentHonnold Foundation: $10,000 · EnvironmentTABLE FOUNDATION COMPANY: $29,250 · Religion
Other$323,000International$110,000Food & Nutrition$95,000Health$85,000Human Services$55,000Education$52,500Environment$35,000Religion$29,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL HARMONY THROUGH PERSONAL EXCELLENCE: $40,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetMercy Corps: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE FOUNDATION COMPANY: $29,250 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPUP DURHAM: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOOK HARVEST: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWell Done Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT BIOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHonnold Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL SISTEMA USA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HARMONY THROUGH PERSONAL EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds TABLE FOUNDATION COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds PARELLI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds STEPUP DURHAM ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOOK HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds Well Done Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BIOME INC ↗
  • Who funds PARVATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Honnold Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EL SISTEMA USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincMD12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hamsa Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hamsa Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hamsa’s filings →

More from the funding graph