Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hammond Family Foundation

$558
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$558
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$12kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kEducation$1kAnimals$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$558
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$558
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS: $100 → 16%ARCHIBALD PROJECT: $100 → 10%HUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%HUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
32

Total granted

$20k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+40%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    4× · 2017–2021 · $600 · revenue +384%
  • CL
    CONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $400 · revenue +89%
  • HP
    Houston Public Media Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $300 · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOLY COMFORTER LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • KT
    KHS THEATRE ARTS BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • HA
    HUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $600

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
2
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
3
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
4
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
5
Paws of Austin Protection of Animal Welfare Services

PAWS' purpose is to provide refuge to stray and unwanted animals. PAWS' mission is to prevent cruelty to all animals by promoting humane standards through education and example, to provide care and shelter for homeless animals, aid in the…

Animals
6
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
7
Chances - Dog Rescue and Relocation

Animal Rescue

8
Houston Cares Animal Rescue

Houston Cares Rescue is a volunteer organization rescuing animals from the streets, and occasionally from shelters, in Houston, TX, and caring for them primarily with foster families until a loving home can be found. We operate a…

Animals
9
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
10
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Aggieland Humane Society

To provide humane shelter, care and placement for stray and unwanted animals, and to promote the human-animal bond and responsible pet ownership to enhance the quality of life for the people and animals in our community.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission and the most unlike its peers is The Archibald Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Food Pantries & AssistanceEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Community Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Public Library SupportCommunity Arts OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Independent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr10%33%35–55yr13%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr13%63%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,774

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOLY COMFORTER LUTHERAN CHURCH — $8,820 · OtherHOLY COMFORTER LUTHERAN CHURCHGOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $1,300 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCHKHS THEATRE ARTS BOOSTER CLUB — $1,100 · OtherKHS THEATRE ARTS BOOSTER CLUBNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $858 · Other+30 more — $6,450 · Other+30 moreKINGWOOD BAND BOOSTERS CLUB INC — $10,700 · PhilanthropyKINGWOOD BAND BOOSTERS CLUB INC+1 more — $100 · PhilanthropyHUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $1,300 · Human ServicesThe Archibald Project Inc — $100 · Human ServicesGuide Dogs of Texas Inc — $100 · Human ServicesSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $950 · Housing & ShelterHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $300 · AnimalsCARE HUMANE SOCIETY — $300 · AnimalsLUCKY LABS RESCUE CORP — $100 · AnimalsGOOD NEIGHBORS ANIMAL RESCUE — $100 · AnimalsSAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND — $100 · AnimalsTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $600 · HealthM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION — $100 · HealthHouston Public Media Foundation — $300 · Arts & CultureALLEY THEATRE — $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$19,528Philanthropy$10,800Human Services$1,500Housing & Shelter$950Animals$900Health$700Arts & Culture$550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKINGWOOD BAND BOOSTERS CLUB INC — $10,700 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Public Media Foundation — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARE HUMANE SOCIETY — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACCESS FUND — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLEY THEATRE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPets for Vets Inc — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Society of Landscape Architects Texas Chapter — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MOUNTAIN GUIDES ASSOCIATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Archibald Project Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuide Dogs of Texas Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY LABS RESCUE CORP — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS ANIMAL RESCUE — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLAVE 2 NOTHING FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hammond Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph