· Private foundation
Hammond Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING | $3,000 |
| FOOD AT FIRST | $3,000 |
| LIVING GRACIOUSLY INC | $3,000 |
| IOWA MIGRANT MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE | $3,000 |
| CENTER FOR CREATIVE JUSTICE | $3,000 |
| THE SUNNY CENTER | $3,000 |
| FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITIO | $3,000 |
| HEALTH TREE FOUNDATION FOR MLTPL MY | $3,000 |
| LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF STORY COUNTY | $3,000 |
| MUSIC WILL | $3,000 |
| THE WATER PROJECT | $3,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TE | $3,000 |
| MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIO | $3,000 |
| TRANS LIFELINE | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MWMUSIC WILL INC6× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +4%
- RPREADING PARTNERS5× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +2%
- TDTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- CGCOMMON GLOBAL MINISTRIESone grant, 2021 · $3k
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -10%- FRFAMILY REACH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ipas works globally to advance reproductive justice by expanding access to abortion and contraception.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.
Gender justice is a nonprofit legal and policy advocacy organization working to advance gender equity through the law.
The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…
National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.
To strengthen Iowa's families and communities by providing free legal help that protects housing, safety, and income-and empowers people to build stable, independent lives. With 10 offices serving all 99 Iowa counties, Iowa Legal Aid helps…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safespace Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dementia Alliance International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC WILL INC ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Translifeline DBA Trans Lifeline ↗
- Who funds THE WATER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Survivors Union ↗
- Who funds IOWA MIGRANT MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds WALDORF LUTHERAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE IOWA ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF STORY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CREATIVE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds FOOD AT FIRST ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BOONE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERS FOR HEALING ↗
- Who funds Christian Adoption Services Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) ↗
- Who funds Access Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH IN NEED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · United Way of Story County Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Mid-Iowa Health Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Weatherspoon Charitable Foundation · United Way of Central Iowa · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hammond Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- Child Rescue Coalition Inc — 20% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.