Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hal and John Smith Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$428k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$1.3MEducation$791kHuman Services$153kFood & Nutrition$141kEnvironment$135kHousing & Shelter$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $361k
$9,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ATLANTA$135,000
AGNES SCOTT COLLEGE$126,000
CHEWONKI FOUNDATION$100,000
CHRIST CHURCH PORTOLA VALLEY$30,000
EPISCOPAL IMPACT FUND$9,000
ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$9,000
ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT$9,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $9k → 11%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $23k → 14%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $9k → 11%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $5k → 14%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $9k → 11%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $5k → 14%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $9k → 11%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $5k → 14%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 11%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 11%ESPICOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
IA
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 21 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$2.4M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+24%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationReligionHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    Agnes Scott College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $526k · revenue +39%
  • TW
    The Westminster Schools Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $200k · revenue +22%
  • EC
    Episcopal Community Services
    7× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • WP
    WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • The President and Trustees of Colby College
    one grant, 2019 · $65k · revenue +24%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
3
Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia

Leading the effort to eliminate hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
6
Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank

The jacobs & cushman san diego food bank is the largest hunger-relief organization in san diego county. its mission is to provide nutritious food to people in need, advocate for the hungry, and educate the public about hunger-related…

Food & Nutrition
7
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
8
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
9
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
10
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
12
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center and the most unlike its peers is Greater Dc Diaper Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ATLANTA — $760,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ATLANTAAgnes Scott College — $526,000 · OtherAgnes Scott CollegeCHRIST CHURCH PORTOLA VALLEY — $216,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH PORTOLA VALLEYFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NAPLES — $117,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NAPLESWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $100,000 · Other+14 more — $279,000 · Other+14 moreThe Westminster Schools Inc — $200,000 · EducationThe Westmin…The President and Trustees of Colby College — $65,000 · EducationThe Preside…Chewonki Foundation Inc — $135,200 · EnvironmentEpiscopal Community Services — $57,000 · Human ServicesGREATER DC DIAPER BANK — $38,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $28,000 · Food & NutritionArlington Food Assistance Center — $28,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $28,000 · Food & NutritionEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities — $57,000 · ReligionIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE INC — $11,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,998,500Education$265,000Environment$135,200Human Services$110,000Food & Nutrition$84,000Religion$57,000Housing & Shelter$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAgnes Scott College — $526,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Westminster Schools Inc — $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc — $135,200 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $57,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities — $57,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER DC DIAPER BANK — $38,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER — $28,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $28,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center — $28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $28,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $28,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOME AND HOPE — $28,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Agnes Scott College
  • Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services
  • Who funds Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities
  • Who funds GREATER DC DIAPER BANK
  • Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES
  • Who funds HOME AND HOPE
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds ARLINGTON SOCCER ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hal and John Smith Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hal and John Smith Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hal and John Smith Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph