Skip to content
Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope.

$421k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$2.8MCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $406,849, the rows itemized in this filing. The $420,710 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,861 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $201k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $151k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TWO RIVERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$99,062
LAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$51,800
CENTRAL MN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$40,000
GOODHUE CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$38,783
EAST CENTRAL MN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$30,715
NORTH ST LOUIS CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$26,619
WEST CENTRAL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$22,606
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SERVING WINONA COUNTY$15,699
FERGUS FALLS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$15,000
ITASCA CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$11,708
THE SOLSTICE PROJECT LLC$9,857
MORRISON CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$9,850
TWIN CITIES HFH (V)$9,000
LAKE AGASSIZ HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,500
REDWOOD RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EAST CENTRAL MN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $31k → 7%CROW RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17k → 7%FERGUS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $32k → 9%WEST CENTRAL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $23k → 9%TWO RIVERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $99k → 9%GOODHUE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $55k → 9%Freeborn Mower Habitat for Humanity: $27k → 10%LAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $60k → 11%Rice County Habitat for Humanity: $35k → 11%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MARTIN FARIBAULT COUNTY: $18k → 11%CENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $72k → 11%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA: $29k → 14%Winona Fillmore Counties Habitat for Humanity: $21k → 14%South Central MN Habitat for Humanity: $46k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $52k → 22%Yankton Co Habitat for Humanity: $30k → 11%Rochester Area Habitat for Humanity: $49k → 9%GOODHUE CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $39k → 9%FREEBORN MOWER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25k → 10%Lakes Area Habitat for Humanity: $55k → 11%RICE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $19k → 11%Central Minnesota Habitat for Humanity: $53k → 11%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA: $34k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $20k → 22%YANKTON CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $21k → 11%ROCHESTER AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17k → 9%Goodhue County Habitat for Humanity: $23k → 9%LAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $52k → 11%RICE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $19k → 11%CENTRAL MN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 11%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $30k → 14%NORTH ST LOUIS CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $66k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $19k → 22%GOODHUE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $23k → 9%LAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25k → 11%CENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $29k → 11%Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity: $28k → 14%North St Louis Co Habitat for Humanity: $66k → 15%CENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $22k → 11%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25k → 14%NORTH ST LOUIS CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $60k → 15%Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota of Minnesota: $25k → 14%NORTH ST LOUIS CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $43k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA: $20k → 14%NORTH ST LOUIS CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27k → 15%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20k → 14%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $19k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 30 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$2.8M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+43%

Still filing today

97%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $282k · revenue +171%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $234k · revenue +22%
  • TR
    TWO RIVERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    4× · 2017–2025 · $174k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CR
    CROW RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue +43%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF STEELE-WASECA AREA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • MC
    MORRISON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
2
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
3
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of St Francois County Inc

To provide affordable housing for the needy.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity Hiawathaland

To provide low cost housing to people who could not otherwise afford home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

—
8
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
9
Mahaska County Habitat for Humanity

A nonprofit ecumenical christian housing ministry dedicated to eleminating substandard housing and homelessness worldwide and to making adequate, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
10
Siouxland Habitat for Humanity

To provide affordable housing for low-income families

—
11
Habitat for Humanity International Chemung County

Chemung county habitat is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access…

—
12
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of the Greater Lacrosse Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is Solstice Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/36
Grantees still filing
31/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $281,515 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCCENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $233,873 · OtherCENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYTWO RIVERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $174,252 · OtherTWO RIVERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITYTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $162,909 · OtherTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITYGOODHUE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $160,497 · OtherGOODHUE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC: $126,581 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INCNORTHWOODS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $114,011 · OtherFERGUS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $104,093 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE GREATER LACROSSE REGION INC: $91,982 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SO CENT MN INC: $89,170 · OtherRICE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $79,297 · Other+20 more: $710,687 · Other+20 moreLAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $216,300 · Housing & ShelterLAKES AREA HABI…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $73,035 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUM…MILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $64,423 · Housing & ShelterMILWAUKEE HABIT…Habitat of Humanity of Redwood River Inc: $24,583 · Housing & ShelterHabitat of Huma…CROW RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $17,464 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $126,080 · International
Other$2,328,867Housing & Shelter$395,805International$126,080

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $281,515 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetCENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $233,873 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetLAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $216,300 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetTWO RIVERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $174,252 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $162,909 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGOODHUE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $160,497 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC: $126,581 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $126,080 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $114,011 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetFERGUS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $104,093 over 3y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE GREATER LACROSSE REGION INC: $91,982 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SO CENT MN INC: $89,170 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetRICE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $79,297 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY FREEBORNMOWER: $74,430 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $73,035 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SERVING WINONA COUNTY: $65,027 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $64,423 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKESIDE INC: $62,268 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY: $57,413 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetEAST CENTRAL MINNESOTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $52,709 over 3y, 61% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WEST CENTRAL MN: $52,606 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MARTIN-FARIBAULT COUNTIES: $52,021 over 3y, 23% of budgetHFH OF DOUGLAS COUNTY MINNESOTA INC: $49,165 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $44,644 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetItasca County Habitat for Humanity: $37,581 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLake Agassiz Habitat for Humanity: $30,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MORRISON COUNTY INC: $24,850 over 2y, 13% of budgetHabitat of Humanity of Redwood River Inc: $24,583 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $19,398 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF STEELE-WASECA AREA INC: $15,600 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PRAIRIE LAKES: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAITKIN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,592 over 2y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity …Thrivent Financial fo…Otto Bremer TrustCommunitygivingGreater Green Bay Com…Spartannash FoundationMardag FoundationNorthland FoundationMightycause Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…
Habitat for Humanity International IncGA63.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group · Otto Bremer Trust · Communitygiving · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Spartannash Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Northland Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home