· Public charity
Habitat for Humanity of California Inc
habitat for humanity california is a coalition of habitat for humanity affiliates working across the state providing, permanent, affordable homeownership housing for working families, by building and preserving homes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $202,192 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $222,642 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,450 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $112k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| hfh east baysilicon | $67,636 |
| hfh greater san francisco | $35,525 |
| hfh greater los angeles | $24,556 |
| san diego hfh | $20,076 |
| hfh orange county | $17,810 |
| hfh greater sacramento | $13,604 |
| hfh ventura county | $9,600 |
| hfh monterey bay | $6,969 |
| hfh pomona valley | $6,416 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHabitat for Humanity of Butte County2× · 2019–2020 · $279k · revenue +78%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES3× · 2017–2021 · $207k · revenue +128%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY2× · 2017–2021 · $109k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MONTEREY BAYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +27%
- PVPomona Valley Habitat for Humanity Incone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Development of affordable housing
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity for san luis obispo brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.
Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Columbia Gorge Habitat for Humanity adheres…
To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.
Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, nevada was established in 1990. habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred…
Chemung county habitat is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access…
Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
Building Communities, Empowering Families
To work together with our community to build more prosperous and vibrant communities by making sure everyone has a decent, safe, affordable place to call home.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to buildhomes, communities, and hope.
Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged
Habitat for humanity of southern santa barbara county is a local nonprofit that partners with people to build, repair, and purchase affordable homes; this work strengthens stability and self-reliance in southern santa barbaraand in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Butte County ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MONTEREY BAY ↗
- Who funds Pomona Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Wells Fargo Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity of California Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.