Skip to content
H3 Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

H3 Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$255k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$2.5M
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIDEAWEE INC$105,013
NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER$50,000
OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC$25,000
BLIND HOPE CAT SANCTUARY$21,999
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,500
SAINT FRANCES ANIMAL CENTER$10,000
FURRR 911$7,200
OPIN INC$5,000
PET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$1,407
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$1,352
NEW YORK CITY CAT COALITION$1,250
THE PURR PROJECT INC$800
CAT ASSISTANCE$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MISFIT ACRES: $10k → 15%OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $25k → 9%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $13k → 6%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER: $25k → 9%BIDEAWEE INC: $105k → 17%NOWZAD ANIMAL RESCUE: $600k → 8%NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER: $146k → 18%SAINT FRANCES ANIMAL CENTER: $10k → 15%CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $13k → 11%FRANKIE'S FRIENDS: $120k → 13%THE LITTLE GUILD: $13k → 9%STARELIEF AND PET ASSISTANCE: $20k → 12%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $128k → 9%MARYLAND ANIMAL SOCIETY INC: $30k → 19%OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $25k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%BIDEAWEE INC: $29k → 17%NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER: $100k → 18%WILDLIFE IN CRISIS: $20k → 9%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15k → 9%OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $13k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%BIDEAWEE INC: $27k → 17%NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER: $100k → 18%WILDLIFE IN CRISIS: $10k → 9%FURR 911 INC: $11k → 9%BIDEAWEE INC: $26k → 17%NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER: $50k → 18%WILDLIFE IN CRISIS: $10k → 9%FURRR 911: $10k → 9%BIDEAWEE INC: $17k → 17%NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER: $50k → 18%WILDLIFE IN CRISIS: $10k → 9%FURRR 911: $7k → 9%ANIMAL HAVEN: $26k → 17%ADOPT-A-DOG: $17k → 9%CAT ASSISTANCE: $10k → 9%ADOPT-A-DOG: $15k → 9%CAT ASSISTANCE INC: $10k → 9%ADOPT-A-DOG: $15k → 9%ADOPT-A-DOG: $15k → 9%PET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $51k → 9%PET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $47k → 9%PET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $33k → 9%PET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $28k → 9%FRIENDS OF FELINES INC: $20k → 9%FRIENDS OF FELINES INC: $10k → 9%FRIENDS OF FELINES INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
CT
CA
UT
MD
AZ
NM
AR
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$924k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$1.5M
$882k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

73%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $446k · revenue +353%
  • BIDEAWEE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $205k · revenue +45%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $600k
  • FF
    FRANKIE'S FRIENDS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue -36%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TAILS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
2
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
3
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
4
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
5
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
6
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
7
Jl Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
8
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
9
All About Animals Rescue Inc

Rescue and rehome homeless cats and dogs

Animals
10
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
11
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
12
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Westchester Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $600,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $445,844 · OtherNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INCPET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $166,795 · OtherPET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETYBLIND HOPE CAT SANCTUARY INC: $100,599 · OtherBLIND HOPE CAT SANCTUARY INC+7 more: $86,725 · Other+7 moreBIDEAWEE INC: $204,623 · AnimalsBIDEAWEE INCBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $146,464 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYFRANKIE'S FRIENDS INC: $120,000 · AnimalsFRANKIE'S FRIENDS INCANJELLICLE CATS RESCUE INC: $119,970 · AnimalsANJELLICLE CATS RESCUE INCOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $62,500 · AnimalsOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INCADOPT-A-DOG INC: $62,360 · AnimalsADOPT-A-DOG INCWILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC: $50,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $45,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF FELINES INC: $40,000 · AnimalsPOSITIVE TAILS INC: $40,000 · Animals+14 more: $176,204 · Animals+14 more
Other$1,399,963Animals$1,067,121

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $445,844 over 5y, 10% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $204,623 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $146,464 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKIE'S FRIENDS INC: $120,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetANJELLICLE CATS RESCUE INC: $119,970 over 5y, 17% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $62,500 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetADOPT-A-DOG INC: $62,360 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetWILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC: $50,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF FELINES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPOSITIVE TAILS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCAT ASSISTANCE INC: $26,750 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $26,054 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADORE A BULLIE PAWS & CLAWS RESCUE INC: $9,350 over 2y, 14% of budgetHOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York City Cat Coalition Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLOOKING GLASS ANIMAL RESCUE: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…American Express Foun…Mbia FoundationThe K FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Duffield Family F…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Ge Aerospace Foundati…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC15.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Express Foundation · Mbia Foundation · The K Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H3 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H3 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to H3 Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to H3 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H3’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home