· Private foundation
H & a Bodenheimer Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k64 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE BETH EL | $23,284 |
| GOLDEN STATE ADAPTIVE SPORTS | $14,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,958 |
| GODDARD SCHOOL OF PONTE VERDE | $11,000 |
| EMANUEL SYNAGOGUE | $6,545 |
| AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,780 |
| CURE SMA | $4,000 |
| MDA | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID | $3,000 |
| AMY'S ANGELS | $2,675 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| MADD | $2,000 |
| CAMP COURANT | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
101 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +93%
- AAAMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION8× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +59%
- KOKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- UPUS POWER SOCCER ASSNone grant, 2022 · $7k
- AGAMAZING GRACE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delray Beach Playhouse Inc and the most unlike its peers is Andrews Ohana Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA ↗
- Who funds AMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP COURANT INC ↗
- Who funds Far West Wheelchair Athletic Association Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ALMADA LODGE TIMES FARM CAMP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Bay Path University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Zachs Family Foundation Inc · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Burton & Phyllis Hoffman Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Auerbach Schiro Foundation · Cheryl Chase & Stuart Bear Family Foundation Inc · The Robert & Margaret Patricelli Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Hartford Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization H & a Bodenheimer Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Association for Community Living Inc — 84% of income from government
- American School at Hartford for the Deaf — 32% of income from government
- Jewish Community Alliance Inc — 12% of income from government
- Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Theaterworks Inc — 3% of income from government
- New England Donor Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bay Path University — 3% of income from government
- The Connecticut Historical Society Connecticut Museum of Culture & History — 1% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
- Kingswood Oxford School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.