Skip to content
H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.5M
Granted FY2023
37
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$17MPhilanthropy$600kEducation$465kEnvironment$356kYouth Development$215kHuman Services$195kFood & Nutrition$140kArts & Culture$90kOther$0
02FY2023 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k23 grants · $520k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $805k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tulsa Community Foundation$500,000
Tulsa Garden Center$356,000
Air Force Academy Foundation$300,000
National Jewish Medical Research Ct$210,000
Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa$125,000
Youth Services of Tulsa Inc$70,000
Kids on Bikes$50,000
The Salvation Army$50,000
Tulsa Community Foundation$50,000
Parents Challenge$50,000
Golden Eagle Club$50,000
Tulsa Lawyers for Children Inc$50,000
Tulsa Symphony Orchestra$50,000
Pikes Peak Community Foundation$50,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Colorad$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Spring Shelter: $20k → 15%Fostering Hope Foundation: $15k → 9%Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahom: $40k → 15%Clarehouse: $30k → 15%The Bridges Foundation: $15k → 15%Stand In The Gap: $25k → 15%Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: $70k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Tulsa Schools

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools was established to build a stronger community through the support of Tulsa Public Schools.

Education
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
5
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
6
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
7
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
8
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
10
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
11
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
12
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Challenge; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Tulsas Future. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

See Line 3a Attachment: $16,972,598 · OtherSee Line 3a Attachment+16 more: $665,000 · OtherTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $550,000 · PhilanthropyAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · PhilanthropyPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTulsa Garden Center: $356,000 · EnvironmentYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesPARENTS CHALLENGE: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc: $30,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · EducationThe Pencil Box Inc: $10,000 · EducationMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $125,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureORMAO DANCE COMPANY INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$17,637,598Philanthropy$900,000Environment$356,000Human Services$215,000Education$145,000Food & Nutrition$140,000Arts & Culture$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTulsa Garden Center: $356,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKIDS ON BIKES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE: $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHomeward Pikes Peak: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY HOPE HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetORMAO DANCE COMPANY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…The Gelvin FoundationThe Sharna and Irvin …Mervin Bovaird Founda…George Kaiser Family …Tulsa Community Found…Grace & Franklin Bern…Oneok Foundation IncCharles and Lynn Schu…The Hardesty Family F…Sarkeys FoundationOne Gas Foundation Inc
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on H A & Mary K Chapman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home