How much did H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

socialeducationtulsacivicarts cultureyouthpikes peak

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

$10k–50k23 grants · $520k
$50k–250k11 grants · $805k
$250k+3 grants · $1.2M

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$85M

Total assets

Largest grants

Tulsa Community Foundation$500,000
Tulsa Garden Center$356,000
Air Force Academy Foundation$300,000
National Jewish Medical Research Ct$210,000
Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa$125,000
Youth Services of Tulsa Inc$70,000
Golden Eagle Club$50,000
Kids on Bikes$50,000
Tulsa Lawyers for Children Inc$50,000
Tulsa Symphony Orchestra$50,000
Parents Challenge$50,000
Pikes Peak Community Foundation$50,000
Tulsa Community Foundation$50,000
The Salvation Army$50,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahom$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tulsa Bike Share Inc

Transforming our Tulsa community by providing a high quality, convenient, and affordable bicycle transit system that connects people to places where they live, work, and play.

Environment

Tulsa Childrens Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—

Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education

University of Tulsa

The University of Tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. Guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education

Tulsa Spca

Animals

Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

Enhancing the image and appearance of Oklahoma City through education, programs and community engagement.

Environment

Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education

One Hope Tulsa Inc

One Hope cultivates safe spaces and relationships for neighborhood flourishing.

Community Improvement

Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma

Empowering families on their journey to independence.

Housing & Shelter

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools

Founded in 2001, the foundation for tulsa schools was established to build a better community through the support of tulsa public schools.the foundation believes that every child should have access to a quality education, the resources…

Education

Ywca Tulsa Inc

YWCA Tulsa is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Regional Stem Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Spring Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

12%

939/7,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

20/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$17,767,598Philanthropy$900,000Environment$356,000Human Services$175,000Education$145,000Arts & Culture$60,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gelvin FoundationOK28.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gelvin Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

10get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Tulsa Garden Center.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 736068213 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Tulsa Garden Center, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 30% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to H A & Mary K Chapman Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph