Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gunnard & Charlotte Johnson Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192020.

Health$140kEducation$136kArts & Culture$27kEnvironment$10kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$6kYouth Development$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kansas Policy Institute$10,000
Migrant Farmers Assistance Fund$5,000
Village Presbyterian Church$1,755
UMKC Foundation$1,250
Kansas City Comm Gardens$1,000
Kansas City Actors Theatre$1,000
Ensemble Iberica$1,000
The Grooming Project$500
Rightfully Sewn$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Nerman Museum: $5k → 5%Kansas Policy Institute: $40k → 16%University of Kansas Health: $100k → 16%Powel Gardens: $10k → 14%St Pauls School: $35k → 15%Crow Canyon: $30k → 15%Village Presbyterian Church: $2k → 5%Kansas Policy Institute: $10k → 16%The Grooming Project: $500 → 15%Saint Lukes Hospital Foundation: $35k → 15%Barstow School: $50k → 15%Boys Grow: $3k → 15%Kansas City Comm Gardens: $5k → 15%Foster House Foundation: $3k → 15%Kansas City Comm Gardens: $1k → 15%UMKC Foundation: $1k → 15%Welcome House: $5k → 15%Rightfully Sewn: $500 → 15%Ensemble Iberica: $10k → 15%Ensemble Iberica: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$78k · 4 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$78k
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+66%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
EducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KP
    KANSAS POLICY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +55%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY ACTORS THEATRE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue +19%
  • EI
    ENSEMBLE IBERICA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Kansas Health
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • TB
    THE BARSTOW SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • SL
    Saint Lukes Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
2
Kansas Manufacturing Solutions Inc

To grow Kansas manufacturing by delivering solutions to small and medium sized manufacturers with value driven results.

Community Improvement
3
Black Repertory Theatre of Kansas City

The mission of The Black Repertory Theatre of Kansas City is to educate and inspire our community by presenting and promoting appreciation for African-American culture through our stories.

Arts & Culture
4
Kansas City Ballet Association

To inspire and engage through the beauty, power and passion of dance

Arts & Culture
5
Kansas City Art Institute

The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.

Education
6
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
9
Economic Club of Kansas City

To sponsor events that enhance members' knowledge of current economic and financial and social issues.

Community Improvement
10
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
11
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
12
Front Porch Alliance - Kansas City Inc

Front Porch Alliance works together with residents of Kansas City, Missouris eastside and urban core to meet their changing needs at home and in school.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Umkc Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ensemble Iberica Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Kansas Health — $100,000 · OtherUniversity of Kansas HealthTHE BARSTOW SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherTHE BARSTOW SCHOOLSaint Lukes Hospital Foundation — $35,000 · OtherSaint Lukes Hospital FoundationSt Pauls School — $35,000 · OtherSt Pauls SchoolIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientENSEMBLE IBERICA INC — $11,000 · OtherPOWELL GARDENS INC — $10,000 · Other+5 more — $15,755 · Other+5 moreKANSAS POLICY INSTITUTE — $50,000 · EducationKANSAS POLICY IN…+1 more — $1,250 · EducationKANSAS CITY ACTORS THEATRE INC — $11,000 · Arts & CultureWelcome House Inc — $5,000 · HealthMigrant Farmworkers Assistance Fund — $5,000 · Human ServicesBOYS GROW CORP — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentRIGHTFULLY SEWN INC — $500 · Employment
Other$286,755Education$51,250Arts & Culture$11,000Health$5,000Human Services$5,000Youth Development$2,500Employment$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKANSAS POLICY INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BARSTOW SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS CITY ACTORS THEATRE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetENSEMBLE IBERICA INC — $11,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetPOWELL GARDENS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWelcome House Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMigrant Farmworkers Assistance Fund — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS GROW CORP — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUMKC FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Miller-Mellor Association · The Torosian Foundation · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gunnard & Charlotte Johnson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph